Results 1 - 7 of 7
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Accusations obligatory? | Rom 5:6 | Percival | 6487 | ||
Orthodoxy, You seem to be confusing the Good News of the kingdom of God with your own personal dogma. This amounts to your condemning anyone that disagrees with the Gospel according to Orthodoxy. I see no evidence that our brother has denied the Christ or blasphemed the Holy Spirit, only that he disagrees with you on the doctrine of election. Can you not discuss this issue without ranting, accusations of heresy, and condemnation of a fellow Christian? Praise the Lord! |
||||||
2 | Accusations obligatory? | Rom 5:6 | orthodoxy | 6502 | ||
Hmm. So the very nature of the atonement doesn't count as "the Good News of the Kingdom of God?" May I ask what does? As far as Paul is concerned, saying that Christ's death is not an actual atonement _is_ denying Christ. He calls everyone that differs on matters of the gospel to be eternally damned. Mr. Keck suggested something that would alter the very nature of the atonement, shifting it from an accomplished fact to a realizable possibility. That counts as pretty fundamental, and I will defend it to the death. | ||||||
3 | Accusations obligatory? | Rom 5:6 | Percival | 6512 | ||
Orthodoxy, I don't recall said fellow every denying atonement, only your definition of 'the nature' of atonement. It is not your defense of the Gospel that I question, but your offense of other Christians. How many others, might I ask, do you consider cursed? Praise the Lord! |
||||||
4 | Accusations obligatory? | Rom 5:6 | orthodoxy | 6527 | ||
There is no difference between "denying atonement" and "denying the nature of atonement." And what is this concern with being "offensive?" Christ never bothered with such niceties. Neither did Paul, nor Peter, nor God for that matter. Show me one time when God is "nice" and I'll show you three where he promises victory to his people and destruction of his enemies. How many do I "consider cursed?" As many as fit Paul's definition by believing "another gospel." And since the atonement _is_ the gospel, questioning that questions the gospel itself. Why should I make bones about this? What's the problem? I will speak as Scripture speaks, and Scripture speaks of those who change the gospel as damned. |
||||||
5 | Accusations obligatory? | Rom 5:6 | Percival | 6530 | ||
Orthodoxy, Please take your curses elsewhere. I am concerned about your offensive nature because this is a Study Bible Forum. This is not an opportunity for you to spout dogma. There are people that refuse to fellowship here because of the acrimony and bigotry evident in your comments. Rebuke those in your household, or in your local church, or people you meet in the street if you so desire. Curse saints to their face if it satisfies your need to be superior, but this venue is inappropriate for such behavior. Praise the Lord! |
||||||
6 | Accusations obligatory? | Rom 5:6 | orthodoxy | 6555 | ||
What's wrong with dogma? And who said anything about bigotry? Put your label gun away. Scripture is full of covenant blessings for obedience and covenant curses for disobedience. Am I to not talk about the consequences of poor theology because you don't want to hear about it? You will find all of my language mirrored in Scripture, my friend. If that's the case, you'll be cutting out most of your Bible. Take issue with that if you want, but God speaks this way to his people, and commands us to do likewise when the situation requires it. I feel absolutely no obligation to submit to pop psychobabble. I will submit to the Word, even it that doesn't win me any friends. |
||||||
7 | Accusations obligatory? | Rom 5:6 | charis | 6582 | ||
Dear orthodoxy, Dogma, when presented as the one and only truth, claiming Divine knowledge, and condemning others, is bigotry and spiritual arrogance. Though the Old Testament may indeed have a fair share of curses, the New Testament contains much more love and grace than rancor and slander. This particular situation does not require your degrading comments, and I take offense at your calling this a forum of 'pop psychobabble.' Please do remove yourself if you don't like this fellowship. It is possible to disagree and still be a gentleman. In Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||