Prior Book | Prior Chapter | Prior Verse | Next Verse | Next Chapter | Next Book | Viewing NASB and Amplified 2015 | |
NASB | Luke 23:46 And Jesus, crying out with a loud voice, said, "Father, INTO YOUR HANDS I COMMIT MY SPIRIT." Having said this, He breathed His last. |
AMPLIFIED 2015 | Luke 23:46 And Jesus, crying out with a loud voice, said, "Father, INTO YOUR HANDS I COMMIT MY SPIRIT!" Having said this, He breathed His last. [Ps 31:5] |
Subject: Did Jesus suffer in hell when he died? |
Bible Note: The temperment of your post seems to be of hostility. Do I come across the same way to you?? You asked me if I followed sound doctrine. Personally I think that's a bad question because of course I'm going to say, "Yes". However; if someone was to point out biblically where something that I believe in was a little off base, I'll listen to what they have to say, pray and meditate on it. God will eventually see that I get the right answer. Do you really believe that no one has taken the time to approach Hinn on his doctrine?? It's to my understanding that he has been approached on several occasions. But much like you said, the man isn't listening. You're quick to rush to the defense of Hinn, but what about the people that his doctrine has affected?? Hinn, was at one time a believer of the Faith Doctrine. Rather he still believe in that doctrine today, I can not say. Anyway, as you probably know, this doctrine taught that sick people was sick because they did not have the faith to be made well. Hinn was also a believer of the Name it and Claim it Doctrine. This doctrine taught that you can speak things into exsistance It really didn't matter if it was the Will of the Lord or not I'm aware of a true story where a follower of a Faith Teacher was diagnosed with an illness. The cure exsist, the treatment was simple. This guy refuse to claim it. As a matter of fact, he had all the faith in the world, how could he be sick. He ended up dying. He was the head of his household, left behind a wife and some children. His wife who was also a believer, changed her belief, and shared her story with many. You rush to the defense of Hinn, but look at the damage that his belief is doing to people. I don't hear you standing up for them. And just for the record, I'm not attacking Hinn, nor his doctrine, at present I'm just stating the simple truth. You also stated to show you where you were wrong in touching God's anointed, would if be fair to assume that you did not read the post sent to you by the Radioman?? This is part of what he had posted, I suggest that you read the entire thing: 'Advocates [of authoritarian rule or unconditional authority for certain preachers and evangelists] assume that Scripture supports their view. Their key biblical proof text is Psalm 105:15: "Touch not mine anointed, and do my prophets no harm" (KJV). But a close examination of this passage reveals that it has nothing to do with challenging the teachings of church leaders. 'It first needs to be noted that the Old Testament phrase "the Lord's anointed" is typically used to refer to the kings of Israel (1 Sam. 12:3, 5; 24:6, 10; 26:9, 11, 16, 23; 2 Sam. 1:14, 16; 19:21; Ps. 20:6; Lam. 4:20), at times specifically to the royal line de-scended from David (Pss. 2:2; 18:50; 89:38, 51), and not to prophets and teachers. While the text does also mention prophets, in the context of Psalm 105 the reference is undoubtedly to the patriarchs in general (vv. 8-15; cf. 1 Chron. 16:15-22), and to Abraham (whom God called a prophet) in particular (Gen. 20:7). It is therefore debatable whether this passage can be applied to select leaders within the body of Christ. 'Even if the text can be applied to certain church leaders today, in the context of this passage the words "touch" and "do harm" have to do with inflicting physical harm upon someone. Psalm 105:15 is therefore wholly irrelevant to the issue of questioning the teachings of any of God's "anointed." The CurtMan |