Results 1 - 4 of 4
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | How do we preach the Gospel? | 1 John 2:2 | Hank | 101168 | ||
John Reformed - Dear John, citing John 3:18 as a reference point, you write: "Those who do not believe, do not, for they are condemned already." ...... John, this is not what the passage says. John 3:18 says, "He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God." ..... Man does not believe because he has already been condemned, and the passage does not say that. He is condemned because he has not believed, and that's what the passage says. ..... The former is a Calvinistic spin. The latter is what the passage actually says. And the two don't mean the same thing at all. --Hank | ||||||
2 | How do we preach the Gospel? | 1 John 2:2 | John Reformed | 101192 | ||
He is condemned because he has not believed, and that's what the passage says. ..... The former is a Calvinistic spin. The latter is what the passage actually says. And the two don't mean the same thing at all. --Hank What then is the is the legal position of those who are not saved? Innocent or Guilty. And if guilty are they not already condemned before placing faith in Christ? Their rejection of Jesus is the fruit of their spiritual condition. Luke 24:11 But these words appeared to them as nonsense, and they would not believe them. |
||||||
3 | How do we preach the Gospel? | 1 John 2:2 | Hank | 101196 | ||
John Reformed - If you wish to quote from my posts, fine. But please be honest enough to quote it in context. --Hank | ||||||
4 | How do we preach the Gospel? | 1 John 2:2 | John Reformed | 101204 | ||
Dear Hank, the factis that I did answer you. It's not my fault that you would not accept it. I dont mind your inserting yourself in the middle, we all do that quite often. But in all fairness...you never addressed the issues I raised, but instead, dismissed them as "calvinistic spin" and "smoke and mirrors." Hardly a basis for a polite arguement over the question at hand. Now, except for an "attaboy" from Ed to Hank, Ed has disappeared. John |
||||||