Bible Question: Was it complete? Did they Have To Be Baptized or not? Could they refuse it since they were already saved? Why was it necessary for them to be baptized if they were already saved? More than that why did Peter command them to be baptized if it had nothing to do with salvation? Was not thier salvation complete? |
Bible Answer: Greetings Grace and Truth! Let me take a stab at your questions! 1) Yes, it was complete, since they had already received the promised gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38) - proof that the phrase 'for the forgiveness of sins' is not connected with the singular command to 'be baptized'. 2) Yes they could have, just as we can refuse to obey any of God's commands as Christians. But, why would they, or we, want to disobey Christ? 3) The verse never says that it was 'necessary' for them to be baptized. 4) Because baptism is commanded by Christ for believers, Peter also commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus. 5) Yes, it was. Now, I have answered your questions, will you please answer mine? Your contention is that Acts 2:38 means that one must repent AND be baptized in order to receive forgiveness of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit. How then did those in Acts 10 receive the gift of the Holy Spirit prior to be baptized? Please be specific! Your Brother in Christ, Tim Moran |