Subject: Was it complete? |
Bible Note: Hank, Hank, Hank; Buck up, ol' buddy. I didn't even see your post to FORUM MEMBERS or Ed's support of you until I came across Brad's followup on the home page. I wasn't following the thread (but now, thanks to you guys, I've been drawn into it). So don't take silence for lack of support. There are over 50,000 messages here now. Anybody is bound to miss a few. You and I have had some ... enthusiastic disagreements in the past, but I'd tell anybody that your posts reveal an abiding respect and knowledge of Scripture. I'm sorry I didn't see (literally) the need at the time. But you bring up an interesting point. I've been hanging out here since October. At the start, it seemed as though most posts were pretty orthodox and pretty well thought out. Here lately, there seem to be a lot of folks who are obsessed with some side issue or some weird interpretation or simply are not Christians. That's all Ok as long as we can have a respectful dialog and maybe enlighten each other. But there doesn't seem to be as much reasoning going on. There seems to be a lot of concordance-driven proof-texting without much study or understanding. To tell the truth, I've thought about my good-bye post too. I guess I'm torn between 1 Peter 3:15 and 2 Timothy 2:23. ;-) Peace and grace, Steve aka Indiana Jones |