Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Is God somehow responsible? | Rom 1:20 | Hank | 70299 | ||
Joe, please, this is a stretch unworthy even of a Calvinist who tries to argue that "all" means "some"! It is, in this example, frankly absurd to consider God the Son within the framework of what Paul is saying in Romans 3:23 to "prove" that when Paul said "all" he really didn't mean "all" after all. --Hank | ||||||
2 | Is God somehow responsible? | Rom 1:20 | Reformer Joe | 70305 | ||
How is it a "stretch" to say that when Paul meant "all" in Romans 3:23, that he didn't implicitly mean "all but Jesus" in this case? All I was trying to demonstrate is that SOMETIMES (not always) the word "all" is qualified by the immediate context or by the context of the whole counsel of God. Is that bad exegesis? If so, please tell me exactly where my reasoning is so "absurd." Thanks, brother! --Joe! |
||||||