Results 1 - 8 of 8
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Did the 3,000 speak in tongues? | 1 Cor 13:8 | Searcher56 | 140302 | ||
Does the Bible say the 3,000 (Acts 2:41) spoke in tongues? It does say that Cornelius and Co. spoke on tongues when the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out (doesn't say received or filled) on them (Acts 10:45-46). Then in Acts 19:5-6 Holy Spirit came on the 12 and they spoke in tongues ... it doesn't say "gift". These are the only two accounts of speaking in tongues at the time of salvation in Acts. | ||||||
2 | Did the 3,000 speak in tongues? | 1 Cor 13:8 | jcsav | 140339 | ||
Did the Bible say the 3,000 received the Holy Ghost? The bible do not say that Paul spoke in tongues when he recieved the Holy Ghost. But we find him saying, he spoke more than them all. Acts 2:4 says they spoke in tongues (all those in the upper room) along with Acts 19:5 that makes, Four. Simon saw them recieve the Holy Ghost. If there is no outward manifestation, how is this possible? | ||||||
3 | Why doesn't the Bible tell about the 3K? | 1 Cor 13:8 | Searcher56 | 140344 | ||
Since you quoted Acts 2:38 about receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit and I believe said that THE sign was speaking in tongues, I asked if the 3000 spoke in tongues. You didn't answer the question. Why doesn't the Bible say they spoke in tongues? Since God mentioned those who were saved spoke in tongues at salvation only twice (Acts 10:46, 19:6) ... I think it is forcing Scripture to say we must speak in tongues to prove we are saved. I agree the Paul did not speak in tongues when he recieved the Holy Ghost (Acts 9:6) ... he was filled in verse 19. Also, that he spokes in tongues more than the Corithians (1 Cor 14:18). It was one of his gifts (1 Cor 12:10) which he used in his travels. He could of spoke Greek, which was maybe learned ... but the audience may have ben more receptive if he spoke in their language. Yes, Acts 2:4 says they spoke in tongues ... in a KNOWN language of the listeners (vv 8-11) ... which I see to be consistent in the Bible when tongues are mentioned. Acts 8:18 doesn't mention tongues and is again forcing Scripture (eisegesis) to say Simon what to copy waht the apostles were doing (vv 19-24). |
||||||
4 | Why doesn't the Bible tell about the 3K? | 1 Cor 13:8 | jcsav | 140365 | ||
How would I know if they spoke in tongues. The bible do not say one way or the other. The bible, also do not verify that they received the Holy Ghost (Spirit). You seem to asume that they did because the bible says they was added. That in itself do not mean that they received the Holy Ghost. I never said that speaking in other tongues was a KNOWN language of the listeners or not. If you are being filled with the Holy Ghost. Who cares. You seem to put a lot on it.You think I sit around wondering what Language I was Speaking when I was Filled. Its the Wind (Spirit) not the movement of the leaves that is most important. | ||||||
5 | jcsav, What does does Acts 2:41 mean? | 1 Cor 13:8 | Searcher56 | 142589 | ||
If the 3000 didn't receieve the Holy Spirit, what does Acts 2:41 mean "So then, those who had received his word were baptized; and that day there were added about three thousand souls." You said "I never said that speaking in other tongues was a KNOWN language of the listeners or not." ... but I have proven the Bible says speaking in tongues is always a known language to a listener. The word "unknown" is not in the original - KJV added the word. Poto and Cabengo did speak in a LANGUAGE only they knew. Linguists said they did speak in a language ... but have declared what Pentecostals speak IS NOT a language. Linguists also know of other accounts where children have developed their own language. |
||||||
6 | jcsav, What does does Acts 2:41 mean? | 1 Cor 13:8 | jcsav | 142635 | ||
If the 3000 didn't receive the Holy Spirit,(remember that is not what I said, I said , the bible) it would mean what it says. You can be added to the visible Church by believing (and yes you can believe and not receive the Holy Ghost) but you can not be a part of the invisible (Body of Christ) until you recieve the Holy Ghost. If Poto and Cabengo did speak in a Language only they Knew. This is not the Holy Ghost (Spirit) so why listen to them. Listen to Paul and the other Apostles. Paul says that the speaker do not understand. The Spirit gives the utterance to speak. It do not come from ones own brain. |
||||||
7 | jcsav, What does does Acts 2:41 mean? | 1 Cor 13:8 | Searcher56 | 142663 | ||
Very interesting that that brain is not included ... does that mean speaking in mindless when the Holy Spirit is invovled? What about the other spirit gifts ... and the writing of the Bible? | ||||||
8 | jcsav, What does does Acts 2:41 mean? | 1 Cor 13:8 | jcsav | 142697 | ||
I did not say God do not use the brain. I meant that the utterance comes from the Holy Ghost and not oneself. God spoke through a donkey. Why is this so hard for you to understand? Do God make use of our minds, yes that is where our spirit is (not physically). But he don't need to. What can your mind add to God? Did those who wrote the Bible always understand what they wrote? | ||||||