Results 1 - 4 of 4
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | The Sons of God in Genesis 6:1-4 | Genesis | The Disciple | 32145 | ||
Jesusman, I need to ask this... If the angels left their domain...what domain and where did they go? And why are they being seen in what your context says is the reference of the surrounding cities to S/G's immorality? In other words, why are the angels being used in relation to the verse itself? If the implication is of sexual immorality and that the cities around and S/G did do these hideous things. WHY bring angels into the text? Would this not convolute the text, if the text was speaking of the immorality of men? According to Vines on Jude 6,7...the definitions I have stated in other posts (to you and others) defines the angels leaving thier supernatural state and also their home. Which is why they were cast to Tartarus. Unless Vines in wrong...how can we conclude anything else? OR, If the Vines is correct, then these angels did in fact leave their supernatural place of ownership(heavenly body), and did in fact, leave their home (heaven) ... I cannot read anything else into what the Vines defined. If they left their heavenly body and left their heavenly home... is this the ONLY reason the Lord cast them to tartarus? Or is the inference in Jude emphatic on the text that...these angels did in fact leave heaven, their supernatural body and did have relations with the women??? The "strange flesh" as it were? I must admit, this verses are compelling in theory and the usage of our language in the translations make it difficult to truly understand. BUT I cannot believe that all the verses we have been over and over were tragically misquoted or misinterpted by these scholars that give us the same translation. Why is it only these verses that substantiate the positions I hold (and others) are incorrectly translated?? Very confusing indeed... *shalom* the Disciple |
||||||
2 | The Sons of God in Genesis 6:1-4 | Genesis | Jesusman | 32215 | ||
Hello, The Bible clearly teaches that an Angel's true domain is in the service to God the Father. Which would mean that they inhabit the spiritual realm and serve God, thus placing them in the Divine throne room. Satan and others rebelled, trying to take control of Heaven, and they were banished. Thus leaving their domain of obedience. As a result, they are to be punished by being sent into_the_lake_of_fire. Jesusman |
||||||
3 | The Sons of God in Genesis 6:1-4 | Genesis | The Disciple | 32328 | ||
You wrote: Satan and others rebelled, trying to take control of Heaven, and they were banished. Thus leaving their domain of obedience. As a result, they are to be punished by being sent into_the_lake_of_fire. "Trying to take control of heaven.."???? "Lake of fire"??? boy is my translation different....... D |
||||||
4 | The Sons of God in Genesis 6:1-4 | Genesis | Jesusman | 32441 | ||
Hello, Haven't you ever studied about Satan and his origins? Isaiah 14:12-15 is believed by many scholors to be parallelling the ambitions of Babylon with Satan's. In this passage it refers to them as trying to take over heaven and overthrow God. In fact, the term "daystar" or "morning star" is translated as "Lucifer" in the KJV, and is identified as Satan. Then in Revelation, you have Satan and his angels being thrown into the lake of fire. So, put them together, and you have Satan rebelling in an attempt to take over heaven. Jesusman |
||||||