Bible Question:
Dear Saints, In my postings thus far I have been attempting to show that the reformed doctrine of Limited Atonement is indeed biblical. I have found it to have been a profitable use of my time and I hope you all have profited as well. I've gained new insight regarding this doctrine and in other areas of Scipture as well. I have learned that much,if not all, the controversy surrounding this "scandalous" doctrine is founded on a fundamental misunderstanding regarding the term ATONEMENT. This misunderstanding seems to have been in existance for at least 140 years. In the course of my research I happened across a theologian by the name of R.L Dabney. It seems that brother Dabney was the chaplain to Stonewall Jackson during the War Between the States. Dabney in his article " The Five Points of Calvinism contends that the problem arises from a confusion over the definition of the term "atonement". This fundamental error promted me to beseech the the saints of this forum to define the term in question. It is my contention that, because this doctrine is one held by Reformed Christians, we are the ones who should be allowed to put forth the definition and that definition alone should be the standard on which the conversation is based. Assuming we all agree, in my next post I will attempt to clarify what atonement means and argue for it's scriptual foundation. In the meantime I earnestly seek your input and guidance. Would'nt it be wonderful if we Christians could actually resolve a breach in our understanding and honor Christ by coming closer together? God Bless you all, John Adams |
Bible Answer: John Adams, define "Limited Atonement" ... I do not see it in any to the Scripture on this thread. Searcher |