☰ Menu
bible.lockman.org  Home | Search
 
  • Lockman.org
  • About Us

    • About
    • Who we are
    • History
    • Who is Jesus?
    •  
  • Shop / Catalog

    • Digital
    • NASB 2020
    • NASB 1995
    • NASB 1977
    • Amplified
    • NBLA (Spanish)
    • LBLA (Spanish)
    •  
  • NASB

    • NASB
    • Amplified
    • LBLA
    • NBLA
    • Permissions
    •  
Click Here
Bibles by the Case, with free shipping
All New NASB 2020 - 44% off
Save 40% or more on Bibles now! Limited quantities

Questions, answers, or notes on a Bible verse:
(i.e. Gen 1:1)
Read the Bible:
Book Chap:verse
New Window
Translation: Search Range: Search word(s):


Search for your Bible question and answer here:


Matthew

SCROLL TO BOTTOM FOR CONTENT THREADS.
Prior Book | Prior Chapter | Prior Verse | Next Verse | Next Chapter | Next Book | Viewing NASB and Amplified 2015
NASB Matthew 16:28 ¶ "Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom."
AMPLIFIED 2015 Matthew 16:28 ¶ "I assure you and most solemnly say to you, there are some of those standing here who will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom."
SCROLL TO BOTTOM FOR CONTENT THREADS.
Bible Question:  I'm brand new to this forum so please let me know if I'm out of line with this question or if it's been asked and answered or if it's not allowed on this site.

Most people that I've talked to about this verse (and related verses) either avoid it altogether or say that it refers to Christ's transfiguration which imediatlely follows in Matt. 17.

I don't believe He is referring to His transfiguration since it took place only six or eight days later. It seems unlikely that Jesus would inform the disciples that some of them would not die in the next week. That's not much of a prophecy.

My questions are:

Is it possible that the coming of the Son of Man (The Second Coming) took place at the 70AD destruction of Jerusalem and fulfilled this prophecy and many others commonly thought to be yet future?

Was the "end" spoken of in the New Testament simply referring to the end of the Old Coventant system rather than the end of the literal earth?

I'm aware that this line of thinking is called Preterism. I've been introduced to it rather recently and I can't disprove it. It has become an obsession with me and I would appreciate it if someone could shed some light on this subject and redirect me back to a more proper understanding of Scripture.

Bible Answer:  Part 1 Did Jesus Already Return in AD 70?

'By Rev. Bill Lee-Warner

'"Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place." Matthew 24:34

'The above passage is found in what is referred to as the Olivet Discourse of Jesus given a few days before Christ's crucifixion. The context for Matthew 24:34 is Jesus' response to the questions of the disciples regarding His return and the end of the age. There are those in the church of Jesus Christ who understand "this generation" to refer to the generation to whom Jesus was speaking the day He gave the discourse.

'The apostle Paul recognized this error and warned Timothy of it when he wrote,
"But avoid worldly and empty chatter, for it will lead to further ungodliness, and...spread like gangrene. Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, men who have gone astray from the truth saying that the resurrection has already taken place, and thus they upset the faith of some." (2 Tim. 2:16-18)

'Today, there is a resurgence of this teaching known as preterism. The term preterism comes from the Latin word praeterism and means "past" or already gone by. The basic teaching of preterism is that the great tribulation has already occured in the distant past, principally at AD 70. Those who hold to this teaching are known specifically as full preterists. There is another subgroup of preterists known as partial or moderate preterists. This latter group sees parts of the Olivet Discourse, or Jesus' teaching on end times, as partially fulfilled in AD 70 but other parts as yet to be fulfilled at the second parousia of Christ. Several efforts have been made to establish preterism as historically sound and biblical but the clear warning of Paul reminds us that it is a...false teaching. The following reasons are offered to the student of Scripture and prophecy for consideration. Be a Berean (Acts 17:11) and examine the Word to "see if these things are so."'
____________________
To read the rest of this article and find out what "the following reasons" are, go to (www.solagroup.org/articles/endtimes/et_0003.html)

  Up   |    Down     View Branch    ID# 183348  
 Questions and/or Subjects for Matt 16:28   Author 
 is this a second coming verse (?)
  jmcdanie
 Matthew 16:28 (?)
  jasonng
 I want to be ready when He ( Jesus) come
  fran1946
 Why was Jesus Transfigured ? (?)
  Ken John
 Disciples will not die (?)
  Four Square
 Matt 16:28 some and see (?)
  following him
 Matt 16:28 "some" and "see" (?)
  following him
 Matthew 16 (?)
  zico82
 Preterism refuted using Scripture alone? (?)
  Coper44
 Part 1 Did Jesus Already Return in AD 70...
  kalos
 Rev. Bill Lee-Warner, It seems to me ...
  Coper44
 Part 2 Did Jesus Already Return in AD 70...
  kalos
 Rev. Bill, Thanks for your input. ...
  Coper44
 Dear Coper, The eschatology questions...
  DocTrinsograce
 Doc, You seem to have taken exception...
  Coper44
 Hi, Coper... No, I didn't take excep...
  DocTrinsograce
 Doc, Thanks again for the spirit with...
  Coper44
 Dear Coper, You asked, "Who gets to ...
  DocTrinsograce
 Hello Coper44, Welcome to the SBF! Yo...
  BradK
 Preterism refuted by Scripture alone (?)
  Coper44
 Hi, Coper... You might find the links...
  DocTrinsograce
 Doc, In reading my response to BradK I...
  Coper44
 Dear Coper, Sounds like a adequate co...
  DocTrinsograce
 Hello Coper44,   In my understanding...
  BradK
 Still not convinced preterism is false (?)
  Coper44
 Hi Coper, What do you make of this pa...
  mark d seyler
 Mark, You are asking the same types o...
  Coper44
 Hi Coper,  Thank you for a good answe...
  mark d seyler
 Mark, Thanks for your compliment and ...
  Coper44
 Greetings Coper! You wrote to Brad: ...
  Morant61
 Tim, First, my intention was not to d...
  Coper44
 It concerns me Mark that you can say 'i...
  jonp
 Hi Jonp, One passage of clear teachin...
  mark d seyler
 Hi You may believe that Revelation is al...
  jonp
 There's a lot here, so I won't try to ...
  mark d seyler
 Hi Mark Thank you for your gracious perm...
  jonp
 “I did not say that no one could count...
  Wild Olive Shoot
 Amen WOS, seems to me the trouble with ...
  stjohn
 Hi, Initially three was the limit of cou...
  jonp
 evolving or devolving? (?)
  stjohn
 Hi, stj... "Claiming to be wise, the...
  DocTrinsograce
 Hi doc; What a amazing proficy. God is g...
  stjohn
 Hi stjohn You can read your Bible becaus...
  jonp
 Hi Jonp; History, is a word that describ...
  stjohn
 Hi stj. I will agree that Adam was an in...
  jonp
 Greetings jonp! Perhaps the discussio...
  humbledbyhisgrace
 Hi steve, I humbly agree. Thank you!  p...
  stjohn
 Hi jonp, well, thank you for you're ans...
  stjohn
 Hello Coper44, I appreciate your resp...
  BradK
 Hi, We must be careful that we do not ju...
  jonp
 Hello jonp, Thanks for your comments....
  BradK
 Hi Brad, My point is partly that we do n...
  jonp
 Greetings Jonp! One problem with your...
  Morant61
 Hi Tim. The danger with labels is that w...
  jonp
 Greetings Jonp! One problem with your...
  Morant61
 jonp, You made some wonderful points....
  Coper44
 Hi Coper Thank you for your reply. My p...
  jonp
 jonp, I understand what you're sayin...
  Coper44
 Hi Coper Thank you for your question abo...
  jonp
 jonp, The KJV-NIV-Greek Interlinear I...
  Coper44
 BradK, I once read a quote that said:...
  Coper44
 Greetings Coper! I have been trying t...
  Morant61
 Tim, Thanks for your input. Any attem...
  Coper44
 Hello Coper, Some questions arise fro...
  BradK
 BradK, It would have been helpful to ...
  Coper44
 BradK, It would have been helpful to ...
  Coper44
 Greetings Coper! Brad raised some exc...
  Morant61
 Tim, I think I've made my point earl...
  Coper44
 Greetings Coper! With all due respect...
  Morant61
 Tim, I stand by what I've said earli...
  Coper44
 you are right the coming of Christ was a...
  stjohn
 stjohn, You can't be serious. The...
  Coper44
 Coper, You wrote: "Matt. 28:16-20...
  jlhetrick
 Jeff, You're right. I shouldn't hav...
  Coper44
 Coper:  With your preterist views I pate...
  Hank
 Coper,  Just in case you still don't g...
  stjohn
 Greetings Coper! First of all, thanks...
  Morant61
 Coper, I ran across this discussion rece...
  Tomret
 Tom, Thanks for your support. I ag...
  Coper44
 Hi Coper, Since the emphasis was on the...
  CDBJ
 CDBJ, After you've expressed your vi...
  Coper44
 Rehi Coper You ask for a timeframe. Jesu...
  jonp
 Why 70 AD. and why predictions? (?)
  Brian#9
 Brian, I hope I'm not out of line since...
  Tomret
 Why 70 A.D. and why predictions (?)
  Brian#9
 Hi Brian, Sorry, I misunderstood the fo...
  Tomret
  Did I read you rite?  "No the Mt. o...
  stjohn
 stj, In Gen. 8 is God's promise afte...
  Tomret
 HI Tom; Well; you make a very good ar...
  stjohn
 Hello again stj, Before I respond to ...
  Tomret
 Hi Tom:  Thank you, so much, for your c...
  stjohn
 Hello again Tom:  the last note cut m...
  stjohn
  Thanks stj for your generous comments. ...
  Tomret
  Thanks stj for your generous comments. ...
  Tomret
 Hi Tom; Well, first of all saying tha...
  stjohn
 Tom, Great to finally write to you. Y...
  Coper44
 Great to have you back Coper. I welco...
  Tomret
 70A.D. or not? (?)
  Brian#9
 Hi Brian, good to hear from you again. ...
  Tomret
 Hi, While I can fully agree that Jesus c...
  jonp
 jonp, Can you provide Scripture that ...
  Coper44
 Hi Coper. Yes there are Scriptures which...
  jonp
 Hi jonp, I'll be glad to give it a shot...
  Tomret
 ( continued) But here is the kicker. Ho...
  Tomret
 hi Thank you for your attempt at an expl...
  jonp
 Hello again jonp, My explanations of ...
  Tomret
 Hi, I know of nowhere in Scripture where...
  jonp
 jonp, If the old covenant passed away...
  Coper44
 Hi Coper. If you read carefully I pointe...
  jonp
 jonp, Since my posts are being limite...
  Coper44
 jonp, I meant to say "restricted" n...
  Coper44
 ... Do you mean to tell me that just bec...
  Searcher56
 Searcher56, I did not say that a Jew ...
  Coper44
 Hello jonp, I recalled an article I h...
  Tomret
 70A.D. or not? (?)
  Brian#9
 Hi, Brian... When you address a perso...
  DocTrinsograce
 Thank you Sir, Will do so in the futu...
  Brian#9
 Hi Brian, Whew that's a lot! I attem...
  Tomret
 Brian, I really appreciate Tom's ans...
  Coper44
 Hello Coper, Well if your synopsis is t...
  CDBJ
 CDBJ, You began by writing "...it sh...
  Coper44
 Greetings Coper, You are persistent in ...
  CDBJ
 There are two questions for the futurist...
  Coper44
 Coper44, My question to you is this,do ...
  lionheart
 Hello coper44, I haven't participate...
  jlhetrick
 Thanks Jeff; Matt 11 "But to what...
  stjohn
 Jeff, Let me start by saying that you...
  Coper44
  Puffed up humility
  stjohn
 stjohn, How one faces a challenge rev...
  Coper44
 Hello Coper, I saw this post earlier ...
  Tomret
 Tom, My wife and I have a 16 month ol...
  Coper44
 Coper, As discovered in our first exc...
  Tomret
 Tom, Thanks for your most recent post...
  Coper44
 Coper,   Your comments are appreciated...
  Tomret
 Hi Tom Your preterism is certainly wonde...
  jonp
 Jonp, If you read both of my last two...
  Tomret
 Hi, As I pointed out Revelation often gi...
  jonp
 Jonp, I see in 13:1 a beast, the 7 heads...
  Tomret
 Coper, I emailed Lockman to see what tem...
  Tomret




bible.lockman.org
Answered Bible Questions
Primary Bible Questions (?)
Bible verses
About StudyBibleForum.com

The Lockman Foundation did not screen Postings. Postings are the opinions of others and may or may not represent a commonly held view.

StudyBibleForum.com Copyright © The Lockman Foundation 2001-2016
Permission to quote guidelines.