Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Rowdy, Rowdy, are you sure? | 1 Tim 2:9 | DocTrinsograce | 132489 | ||
Brother Ed, I was answering Tim's request for expansion on what I thought of as heresy and apostasy. Are you going to see yourself in every single post I make? I think highly of you, sir, but honestly, I do not think of you to the exclusion of all else. | ||||||
2 | Rowdy, Rowdy, are you sure? | 1 Tim 2:9 | EdB | 132507 | ||
Doc Your artful at dodging a question and not giving a direct answer. Here is your statement made to me. Please explain you usage of heresy and apostasy in that statement. "Sir, I do not know the root cause of your sensitivity toward me. Perhaps it comes from my inability to happily accept heresy and apostasy as suitable bed-fellows with the truth. Perhaps it comes from my screen name. Perhaps it is something else entirely. I do not know. But I do know this: your sensitivity is causing you to feel offense when none is intended. I have prayed and searched my conscience as I composed this post.” This isn't something directed at Tim this is word for word what you said to me. Secondly you said, "I understood your comments to indicate that extrapolating doctrine from Biblical narratives was a valid method for you in your tradition." Let me ask you came to that conclusion when I never even hinted at that. What I said was " Doctrines derived by exegesis and hermeneutic if done properly will never conflict with the whole of scripture but rather will stand in complete agreement with the whole of scripture. And further it will do so without the need to reinvent definitions or explain away conflicting words or situations." Again your response wasn't to Tim it was directed at me. Incidently Tim responded your you post to me asking you what you meant. So yes I think I do see myself in it. EdB |
||||||