Results 1 - 7 of 7
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Rowdy, Rowdy, are you sure? | 1 Tim 2:9 | DocTrinsograce | 132401 | ||
Sir, thank you for your kind and considered words. I am quite certain that your intentions are of the very best sort. Some years ago I would have agreed with every word. I, too, felt very strongly that the mere thoughts of men were of no consequence. That I had something better in what I called "the leading of the Holy Spirit." It was a very comfortable place to be because it allowed me to discount any teaching that didn't "feel right" (which I called "discernment"). Of course, since I remained ignorant of anything that believers thought, suffered, experienced, or fought for, I was happy that I had reached the pinnacle of theological knowledge: "just Jesus and me." I said to myself, "I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing!" But I didn't know that I was "wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked." I didn't realize that what I was doing was living in the same kind of error that Gnostics espoused. Of course, I didn't know that because I didn't know what Gnostics were or what they believed. I couldn't see error, because I didn't bother to learn how Satan had deceived men in the past. I didn't even believe that I needed to diligently study the Word of God, because I thought the time had come when the Spirit would do all the teaching. Ignorance had become a crown that I wore proudly. My pastors and teachers told me how much closer to God I was for having the courage to shed all those old, musty traditions. I do appreciate what you are trying to do, sir. I have the same desire to help you! Isn't that why we are here in this forum... to learn and help others learn the truth of God? The truth of God is ageless. We in the Reformed Baptist tradition do not think that the truths of the doctrines of grace grew from the mind of Paul, Augustine, Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, Whitfield, Toplady, Edwards, Spurgeon, Lloyd-Jones, Schafer, or MacArthur. No, we believe that they originated entirely in the mind of God, before the foundation of the world. That truth spans ages. Do I find my identity in truth? Yes, sir I do. For truth is dear to the heart of my Savior, so how cannot it not be dear to my own heart? It is late for me again. I must sign off more quickly than I would have preferred. We will talk again. Deuteronomy 32:7 Remember the days of old, consider the years of many generations: ask thy father, and he will shew thee; thy elders, and they will tell thee. |
||||||
2 | Rowdy, Rowdy, are you sure? | 1 Tim 2:9 | Aixen7z4 | 132408 | ||
And thank you for your kind offer of help. I trust it will be OK with you if I decline. There are many areas in which I need help. But another discussion of Reformed theology is not one of them. The idea of considering the traditions of men is already settled with me. Now, some men answer harshly, and I do my best to avoid that. The question: “Do you think you know everything?” is one I have heard before, and I am doing what I can here to forestall it. Let us just say I do not have a felt need for the traditions of men, and no felt need to discuss any of them. If it helps let me also say that I have read more books, done more analyses, written more papers, than I care now even to remember. Should I have studied the religions of the world? Should I have compared and contrasted the major denomination of Christendom? I do not know. Truly I have found that “Of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh” (Ecclesiastes 12:12). I have come to the conclusion that we are to “Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man”. Then you may ask why I visit this forum. Truly it is not to discuss the ideas of men or to learn from them. I am here to discover and to share ways to put the word of God into practice. My business is counseling, and I help people to do what the Bible says. My ministry is evangelism, and I seek in every way to preach the Gospel. At my age, that is about it for me. I seek to lay aside every weight so that I might run this race and finish it with joy, and theoretical discussions are, for me, a distraction. I learned some time ago that the ideas of men give rise to denominations and to division in the church, and that is not a good thing. They give rise to endless discussions with accompanying rancor and the result is further division. I have learned that I need to be one with every person who believes on the Lord Jesus Christ. I think we need to rely on the word of God alone, no other books, and the Holy Spirit. I realize there are others who think differently and I think we should not discuss it. As you can imagine, I think we can very well fulfill Deuteronomy 32:7 today. The days of old, and the years of many generations are covered in the Bible. Our father may very well be Abraham or Moses or Samuel or David or even Paul. He is the one who said “Those things, which ye have both learned, and received, and heard, and seen in me, do: and the God of peace shall be with you” (Philippians 4:9). As for the elders, the apostles will do. They have told us (Hebrews 2:3,4; I john 1:3; etc.). We have always had to choose which tradition we would follow (Matthew 15:1-6;Galatians 1:14; etc.). I hope you find this response to be soft and gentle and loving, and that you can respond in kind (Colossians 4:6). I hope you will understand if I decide to stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught by our Apostle and High Priest, and by his apostles. The help I need is in practicing what they taught. |
||||||
3 | Rowdy, Rowdy, are you sure? | 1 Tim 2:9 | DocTrinsograce | 132418 | ||
We should never give ground quickly or easily in any area of doctrine. That is, quite possibly, a more serious problem than the original error (James 1:8). You have focused on the phrase "the traditions of men" and used it to effectively negate anything that I might say. Of a truth, I am no more interested in embracing the traditions of men than you are, Nobel. Without knowing them, how do we recognize them? Without knowing them, how do we scrutinize them in the light of scripture? If we can't do the latter, how can we know not to jettison something inspired and committed to men by God? You are very kind and loving, sir. I appreciate that very much. Those virtues are well worth emulation. Furthermore, only the fool despises rebuke. So I have carefully weighed your thoughts. I will not discount every thing you say by labeling it and denying that any of it is of God -- doing that is not of the Spirit. I will continue to "test all things, and keep that which is good." While I "study to show myself approved." We are men, we operate in the world of ideas. Although it might sound spiritual to say that we can rise above such things, that is not very rational. Ideation is a way in which God has made us like unto Himself. Reason and knowledge are not to be scorned. God is, after all, eminently rational. I am grateful and praise His name that He has not left us with no other tool than the mind. We have the all sufficient Word, His Holy Spirit, and we are new creatures. Together these are more than adequate for the renewing of our minds. Thus, our great battle is to remove the lie, no matter how disguised, and replace it with the truth. Theology has a bad connotation to many modern people. Partly, I believe, because of some of the movements in the sixties and seventies. You might recall that there was much of the division and denominationalism that you spoke about during this time. These folks claimed they had found something better. Whole new non-denominational denominations were formed, and now have grown into some of the largest churches in the land. Sir, you state that you need help practicing what Christ and His apostles taught. Won't "He who spared not His only son, give us all things unto godliness?" He has empowered us with His Spirit and with truth. The Sermon on the Mount, for example, is entirely unsuitable for the world. It is not an evangelistic message, instead it describes the regenerate follower of Christ. Look at the Pauline Epistles. Lets take Ephesians as probably the simplest example. The last three chapters contain over thirty imperative statements. I used to despair over that, complaining, "Paul, how do you expect me to keep all these rules?" I had missed the point of the first three chapters. There is not a single imperative statement in the first three chapters. They are entirely theological. Consequently, as any good American would do, I thought, "Let me get past all this fluff to the brass tacks. I want the practical stuff." What I failed to understand was that theology (what we know and think of God) always comes before obedience (how we walk in His statutes). Almost all of the Pauline epistles are structured this way: theology then practice. You have chosen well in desiring to practice what the New Testament teaches. Christ defined the kind of love we were to have when He said, "He that hath my commandments and keepeth them... loveth me." Note, however, that this was after His statement "Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free." Our freedom to apply His teachings are rooted in knowing the truth. Sir, I understand that my message is odious to many. I call us all to a disciplined life of the pursuit of holiness and the embrace of sound doctrine. God is deserving of nothing less. He has equipped us with all that we need to live such lives. It is an antinomy that He has sanctified us and yet calls us to lives of greater sanctification. However, considering what He has done for us, can we offer Him anything less than our entire, strenuous, devotion? Our entire bodies, souls, and minds? In Him, Doc |
||||||
4 | Rowdy, Rowdy, are you sure? | 1 Tim 2:9 | kalos | 132428 | ||
Doc: You are so right when you say: '...theology (what we know and think of God) always comes before obedience (how we walk in His statutes).' As I've said before, it has to be doctrine first, practice second, and then behavior. Knowing what the Bible teaches is necessary to right behavior. What we believe most definitely affects how we live. Belief comes first and then behavior. WHAT, as well as Whom, we believe greatly impacts the way we live. Grace and shalom, Kalos |
||||||
5 | Rowdy, Rowdy, are you sure? | 1 Tim 2:9 | DocTrinsograce | 132488 | ||
Thank you, Kalos. A lot of error seems to stem from a too low view of God and/or a too high view of man. We also often greatly err when we do not fully recognize -- if that is possible -- the true holiness of God. The other side of that coin is to esteem the sinfulness of man too lightly. Although we know from scripture that these errors are rooted in the flesh, in modern parlance we think of these things as ideas. Regardless, if our knowledge is not rooted in the truth, then we will practice error, and live amiss. In Him, Doc PS Such a word of encouragement is very valuable to me at the moment. Thank you again. |
||||||
6 | Rowdy, Rowdy, are you sure? | 1 Tim 2:9 | kalos | 173578 | ||
The bad news: It seems that the content of this forum contains more error than the TBN television network. The good news: The content of this forum also contains more truth than TBN. Grace to you, Kalos |
||||||
7 | Rowdy, Rowdy, are you sure? | 1 Tim 2:9 | Hank | 173582 | ||
Kalos, we of SBF must work hard at it to contain more error than TBN. That's a garguantuan accomplishment than which perhaps no Forum in the wide world can do half as well. But as for this Forum containing more truth than TBN, well that's a piece of cake. Even politicians and used car salesmen could make that claim. --Hank | ||||||