Results 1 - 4 of 4
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | A FALSE TEACHING? Yes / No | Matt 8:5 | gracefull | 94194 | ||
radioman2, I have a suggestion. If you really want folks here to see what KC teaches in context, why don't you post His entire message instead of posting from a site that is choosing bits and pieces of a teaching to discredit. Is that right? Post his actual teaching and THEN comment on it. This thread is filled with unsubstantiated accusations and slanderour remarks. God can't be pleased. God bless |
||||||
2 | A FALSE TEACHING? Yes / No | Matt 8:5 | Radioman2 | 94218 | ||
Gracefull: In this thread my posts are filled with references to the actual publications in which Copeland himself said the things that are quoted. Perhaps you missed these sentences, so I quote from my posts: "(Footnote 37. Kenneth Copeland, The Image of God in You III (Fort Worth: Kenneth Copeland Ministries, 1989, audiotape #01-1403), side 1.)" - - - - - - - - - - - - - "[Note: Numbers in the text are footnote numbers. To read the footnotes providing reference sources for this article, go to: (www.equip.org/free/DC755-2.htm)]" "To read more, including extensive footnotes, go to: (www.equip.org/free/DC755-2.htm)" (The footnotes to which I refer are those giving the original publications in which Copeland said these things.] Grace to you, Radioman2 |
||||||
3 | A FALSE TEACHING? Yes / No | Matt 8:5 | gracefull | 94294 | ||
Thanks Radioman2, but that was not my point... Sigh... never mind... God bless |
||||||
4 | A FALSE TEACHING? Yes / No | Matt 8:5 | EdB | 94301 | ||
Graceful It was your point, your point was Copeland was a sound Biblical teacher. Radioman2 provided more than adequate proof that he wasn't. You then tried to confuss the issue by saying these are remarks attributed to Copeland but that Copeland really didn't say that. The Radioman2 provided proof they weren't simply misquotes or even slips of the tongue but in many cases statements in books that Copeland wrote. Then you said well they were taken out of context so Radioman provided context. Now when all your arguments fail you say that was not my point.... sigh... never mind.... Infering everyone is so thick they can't understand your deeper spiritual meanings. BALONEY!!!! Either have the guts to admit your wrong or go find some place else to trout your WOF junk. EdB |
||||||