Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | 70A.D. or not? | Matt 16:28 | Coper44 | 183998 | ||
jonp, Since my posts are being limited and edited this will be my final post to you. I pray, if the preterist position is true, you will one day have your eyes opened. If the futurist position is true, I pray that I will find my way back. One final point to wrap up the "old covenant" line of thought. Throughout the book of Hebrews we see the old covenant system including the priesthood, temple, sacrifices etc. still in progress (Heb. 8:3-6, is in the present tense and 9:1 ties the continuing regulations and the earthly sactuary, or temple, to the first covenant. See also Rev. 11:1,2). They ended finally and forever at the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. It's as if God was giving the Jews one generation to be evangelized, while the gospel also went out to the gentiles, then he would bring down their system in a dramatic way as predicted. This is why the 40 or so years (a generation, ironic I think) are referred to as a "transitional period" between the old and new covenants. I pray that God will bless you in your studies, Coper |
||||||
2 | 70A.D. or not? | Matt 16:28 | Coper44 | 183999 | ||
jonp, I meant to say "restricted" not "edited". Coper |
||||||