Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | The Sons of God in Genesis 6:1-4 | Genesis | The Disciple | 32143 | ||
Jesusman, Like I said before. You havent explained the line of Cain and Seth theory. You have stated, that the "sons" are not angels. Tell me the verse (Gen6:4) isnt saying... "In those days were the nephilim, and also afterwrd.." How were these Nephilim brought about? "when the sons of God and the daughters of men..bore children." So is this not saying, the nephilim came into being because of this union? If so, then the reference of the nephilim being there in those days and also afterward of the flood could not have transpired since Cains lineage passed on with the water. Myself and some others in here, we see this verse meaning the giants were before and after the flood. I cannot believe the fathers of these translated versions were so far off in the greek grammer as to not state what is and not what isnt. In a post I wrote this: Dare we read Jude 1:6,7 again? v6- "And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own abode, He has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day;" v7- "as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vegence of eternal fire." Lets dig now and see what could be AN answer (not The) to the issue at hand. 6a- "And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation,..." "estate" - Pg 207 Notes (5) In Jude 6 'arche', (is defined) principality, Revised Version and KJV 'principality' According to Vines: Pg 488 Last paragraph (arche), In Jude 6, RV, it signifies, not the first estate of fallen angels (as KJV), but their authoritative power, "their own" indicating that which had been assigned to them by God, which they left, aspiring to prohibited conditions. See: Begin. Pg 58 B.Noun - Begin(arche) is defined as a verb - "to be first" 6b- "but left their own habitation,..." "habitation" Vines Dict: Pg 286 1. oiketerion, is used in Jude 6, of the heavenly region appointed by God as the dwelling place of the angels. Would this be a safe variation of v6 ? "And the angels who voluntarily decided to dismiss their authoritative position assigned by God, knowing full well of the prohibitive conditions. They left their dwelling place (heaven). He(God) had these angels reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day." v7 - "Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner,..." KJV "as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them IN A SIMILAR MANNER TO THESE..." NKJV In the NKJV vs6 ends with a semi-colon (;) and verse 7 begins, "as". A semi-colon tells us, co-ordinate clauses having a relationship in meaning not explicity stated are being seperated. I guess you can say, what was just stated is being defined a little bit better. Here in the Bible the writer is using S and G as a point of reference to what was just stated. In the KJV v7 starts out, "Even as" "As" simply defined. Same, just like. so vs7 tells us... "Just like S/G and the cities around them IN LIKE MANNER(KJV)...IN A SIMILAR MANNER TO THESE(NKJV)..." In the New American Standard Bible (NASB), vs7 reads, "Just as S/G and the cities around them, since they as in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example, in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire." What may we see is being stated here? Did the angels in vs 6 knowing full well the outcome of their exploits leave their original place of authority and their home to partake of the flesh? Or have I "read into" the definitions as laid out by my Vine's Dictionary? In all the versions I have at my disposal(8) the cross references to vs 6 are all the same. 2Pet2:4 1Tim5:21 Job 1:6 Gen3:24 Your response was solely saying I am not in left field. But you never really addressed how the Vines defines these verses. Truly I am not trying to beat a dead horse. For me and some others, until we are compelled otherwise...the horse is still alive and so is the salmon still swimming upstream. It would seem your horse and salmon is dead. Which is too bad. I refer back to Titus 1:9 again for you. Should we STOP ?? *shalom* the Disciple |
||||||
2 | The Sons of God in Genesis 6:1-4 | Genesis | Jesusman | 32218 | ||
Hello, I have given proof that angels cannot be the "Sons of God" in Genesis 6. Therefore, the only explaination left is that it must be referring to the lines of Seth and Cain. What else can it be? Space Aliens from another galaxy? Jesusman |
||||||
3 | The Sons of God in Genesis 6:1-4 | Genesis | The Disciple | 32329 | ||
Jesusman, Space aliens from another galaxy....well...thats quite a statement. You may not be too far off with that. Your proof that the sons of God cant be angels doesnt correspond with the Vines dicitonary as I read it.... So much for compelling..?? And you say, "Therefore, the ONLY explanation left is that it MUST be referring to the lines of Seth and Cain." Truly this is a definition of scripture based on silence. Is it not? Please tell me...the Nephilim is not being presented as the offspring of this Union of Sons and Daughters. And Please tell me...this offspring is not what is being discussed as being there before and after the flood. And if you tell me these things...compel me with reasonable scripture to say this is not what happened. But do not compel me by stating your view is EMPHATICALLY the correct view. WE BOTH could be so far off ... since we see dimly in a mirror right now. *SHALOM* D |
||||||