Subject: "Sons" of perdition? |
Bible Note: Love Foundation, is is as clear as the noonday sun that it was you, not Kalos, who insisted on substituting 'Satan' for 'son of perdition' in John 17:12. His purpose in making the substitution was purely didactic, to show you how ridiculous the passage read when the substitution was viewed in the context of the sentence. May I kindly but firmly suggest to you that in future you know more fully whereof you speak before you hurl unjust criticism against a fellow user of this forum. It is all too tempting to find fault when the fault, dear Love Fountain, lies not in others but in ourselves. --Hank |