Results 1 - 6 of 6
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Does speaking in tongues come naturally? | Acts | justme | 91856 | ||
Is tongues a gift, that if a new Christian were isolated and left alone, with only a Bible, would this person speak in tongues with out being taught, or observation of others speaking in tongues? Thank you for honest answers. justme |
||||||
2 | Does speaking in tongues come naturally? | Acts | cajam | 91857 | ||
Hi, Justme could you clarify what you mean by "with out being taught" Do you mean being taught the scriptures? | ||||||
3 | Does speaking in tongues come naturally? | Acts | justme | 91861 | ||
I mean exactly what I said, With no outside suggestions, or having seen tongues, or being instructed or implied that is was expected. Yes only by reading Scripture. justme |
||||||
4 | Does speaking in tongues come naturally? | Acts | cajam | 91866 | ||
You can receive the Holy Ghost and speak in tongues as the spirit of God give utterance. This is not learned. It mean exactly what it says.You can speak in tongues when you receive the Holy Ghost with out having to have seen or heard others speak.I know this for a fact.However, the scriptures shows that you must receive instruction(Roman 10:14-17) I can not put God in a box, but no where in scripture did God fill any one with the Holy Ghost by them reading the word without someone to instruct them. | ||||||
5 | Does speaking in tongues come naturally? | Acts | justme | 91917 | ||
cajam: Just to make an interesting point,there is no such word in the Greek New Testamment as Holy "Ghost". The correct translation is Holy Spirt. I am aware of this comes from the KJV, but is is not correctly translated as we use the language today. At first you say "You can receive the Holy Ghost and speak in tongues as the spirit of God gives you utterance. This is not learned." Then at the end you say "...,but no where did God fill any one with the Holy Ghost by them reading the word without someone to instruct them." I am confused is this not a contradiction? The verses you suggest back you position are directly dealing with Salvation not the gifts or tongues or any other gifts. I think it is wise to make sure the portion of Scripture to back our beliefs are not lifted out on context. I am asking this question about tongues because I wonder if no one tried to teach tongues would this "gift" die out without teachers. In the same note I would ask how are other gifts of the Holy Spirit inplanted in a believer? Are other gifts learned as well? Thank you for helping me understand this very complex gifts of the Spirit. justme |
||||||
6 | Does speaking in tongues come naturally? | Acts | cajam | 92056 | ||
Greetings justme I used (Romans 10:14-17)"How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how can they hear with out a preacher. (Example) When Peter preached to Cornelius and those with him Acts 10:46 states " While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. Note: (Acts 10:46) For they heard them SPEAK WITH TONGUES AND MAGNIFY GOD.Peter did not teach or preach tongues. Only the Word.This did not come by study or reading. This tongue is not the gift of tongues but the sign when one receive the Holy Ghost. There is a difference in the two and that is one reason there is confusion. This can seem complex. But if you would like to discuss this farther I can E-Mail you with my number. May God Bless | ||||||