Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | But isn't that a contradiction | Gal 2:17 | Justin White | 13644 | ||
Hello Scripture must be read in context. 'an eye for and eye and a tooth for a tooth', from face value, contradicts 'turn the other cheek' but in context it makes complete sense. Think how Satan deceived Eve by twisting the truth of God's word. Think how Satan tempted Jesus by using scripture out of context. The apparent contradictions in scripture are not contradictions at all. Try not to look at scripture in isolation. With regard your question how would you then explain God asking us to pray for His will (this indicated that His will is not being done) and also the fact that He works all things together (why would He have to work things together if they were merely part of a “script” playing itself out) Many other religions have been fooled by only following part of the inspired Word of God and thereby ignoring the fundamental "in context" rule of thumb. If I maybe haven't answered your question I hope that at least I have encouraged you not to read (or find understanding) in isolated scripture. Yours in Christ Justin |
||||||
2 | But isn't that a contradiction | Gal 2:17 | RWC | 13692 | ||
Hello Justin, I believe that the 66-book canon of the Christian Scriptures were inspired in their original writing. And, since God is perfect in all He is and does, there were no errors or contradictions in those writings. And you are quite correct: context is critical to correct understanding. I am not suggesting that there is a contradiction in Scripture. It seems to me that there is a contradiction within a strongly Calvanistic understanding of the Scriptures. In other words, it seems to me (and it might be my own misunderstanding of their point of view!) that Calvin (and indeed, many before him and after him) have carefully read the Scriptures and yet came to at least 2 conclusions (interpretations? understandings?) that contradict each other. What I do not as yet understand is how those conclusions (ie. that 1. God has predestined everything that comes to pass and 2. God is not the author of sin) can both be true at the same time. They seem, to me at least, to be glaring contradictions (ie. they cannot both be true). If you can help me to understand this point of view, it would be greatly appreciated! Bob |
||||||
3 | But isn't that a contradiction | Gal 2:17 | Justin White | 13735 | ||
Hello, Bob, An interesting way of looking at predestination is to view God's will and His plan as separate. Simply put, His will is that we don't sin; he knew beforehand that we would. Knowing us intimately He was fully aware of what our every detailed deviation from His will would be. He then used this knowledge to work all things together … this working together He predestined. Therefore He planned all things without taking away our choice. Like you, I am always open to the viewpoints of others as long as they do not conflict with the foundation of Christ the Messiah. I pray that the Spirit gives you the revelation you desire. Your brother in the faith Justin |
||||||