Results 1 - 4 of 4
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | KJV vs "New Age Bible Versions"? | 2 Tim 3:16 | DAIRYLEADER5 | 98883 | ||
Radioman2, "A Seminary degree is not required....Hebrew and Greek languages..., I dont care for a lot of the new translations, but come on now, How many people do you know that are lost or young Christians that know anything that your talking about or care. 1 John 2:27 "But the anointing which ye have recieved of Him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you;...to keep people from being confused I use the KJV,and NASB only. We dont need Greek or Hebrew or any other language to teach Jesus. There are thousands of people in the Tennesee and Kentucky Hills that only understand plane english,Didnt paul state that its better to speek 10 words of understanding..ect..Im studying Hebrew, but not to teach Bible. This is a Study Bible forum not a book review. Lets all come together and teach what the Holy Spirit tells us to teach. just a thought. DL5 | ||||||
2 | KJV vs "New Age Bible Versions"? | 2 Tim 3:16 | Hank | 98924 | ||
DAIRYLEADER5 - Quoted from your response to Radioman: "We don't need Greek or Hebrew or any other language to teach Jesus." ...... How then did you come to learn about Jesus? Was language not involved? Since Scripture was originally written in Greek and Hebrew, somebody certainly needed to know Greek and Hebrew as well as English to make possible the English Bible you and I read. And wouldn't you agree that it's helpful for us to know how to read basic English or, if not English, some other language? Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to make heads or tails out of any Bible no matter what language it was written in. ..... I agree with you, a seminary degree is not a requirement for being able to read the Bible. But literacy is. ..... And by the way, the sort of "book review" that Radioman favored this forum with presents information that is worth knowing. There are untold numbers of Christian people being hood-winked into believing the fantastic idea that all modern versions of God's word are suspect and untrustworthy; that modern translators are united in some diabolical conspiracy to subvert the Scriptures; and that, by a process that has never been explained, the KJV is the only reliable version in the English language. Accordingly, I'd say Radioman's post was considerably more than a mere book review. It's information all Christians need to know. --Hank | ||||||
3 | KJV vs "New Age Bible Versions"? | 2 Tim 3:16 | DAIRYLEADER5 | 98975 | ||
Why cant Christians believe that God in His infinate wisdom, delivered to us gentiles the Bible in its intirety where by we can take what He gave us and understand it. We speek english so we have a Bible in English, If we were french He would have given us a french language Bible to Read. I can see that most here again want to twist words around to make some point.But a word of cauton, dont put C.H.Spurgon on a pedistle thats where God, Jesus and the Holy Ghost belong.Ill be leaveing these types of post alone so no one gets up set teach german, latin ect. if you wish. Ill go back and post articles on Christ return. DL5 | ||||||
4 | KJV vs "New Age Bible Versions"? | 2 Tim 3:16 | Morant61 | 98994 | ||
Greetings Dairyleader5! I think Hank's point is that the Bible was given to us, but it was given to us in Greek and Hebrew (with one section of Daniel in Aramaic). It was not given in English. It was translated into English from these other languages, so someone must understand these other languages in order to translate it! :-) Your Brother in Christ, Tim Moran |
||||||