Results 1 - 12 of 12
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | BradK | 149625 | ||
Hi Janae, I would echo the thoughts of both kalos and Hank. I'm not against you either. However, I do not see any scriptural warrant for additional "annointings", etc. Again, 2 Cor. 1:21 is very telling as to what the annointing is. We ARE annointed as believers! Without intending to be critical, your responses have been more focused on experience than giving solid scripture?! Janae, all of us as believers are annointed, so we've all "experienced"- or more correctly have- the annointing. My caution is that we don't go beyond what scripture does:-) Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
2 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | Praise Be To God | 149631 | ||
Hi, BradK. I know what you are all saying, and I know that you are purists in that if it is not in the Bible then you do not agree with it. But I know what I have personally experienced and I cannot discount that, nor do I want to. The Holy Spirit is a living person of the Trinity and He teaches us all things. HOW HE TEACHES IT is up to Him. Janae |
||||||
3 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | Hank | 149638 | ||
Janae, in referring to the teachings of the Holy Spirit you write, "How he teaches it is up to Him." Now, Janae, this may surprise you, but I agree with your statement! It is up to Him and He has already decided it. His decision is revealed in 2 Timothy 3:16. --Hank | ||||||
4 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | kalos | 149660 | ||
Hank: I agree with you. And I want everyone to know that basing doctrine on Scripture plus experience, as opposed to Scripture alone (sola scriptura), is not the teaching of the Assemblies of God. Giving experience equal weight with the written word of God is the false doctrine of the Word of Faith movement. Well, Hank, that makes two people in two days that have implied that Scripture alone is not sufficient. One says we need Scripture PLUS capital letters in the translation. The other says we need Scripture PLUS experience. Sadly, Kalos * * * * * * * * * * * * * www.seekfind.org Christian Search Engine The mission of SeekFind.org is to provide God-honoring, Biblically-based, and theologically-sound Christian search engine results in a highly accurate and well-organized format. |
||||||
5 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | Wild Olive Shoot | 149664 | ||
Just a question. Show me where in the Bible I may find the term "Sola Scripture" as being the word of God? Isn't Sola Scripture in fact a man's teaching that didn't arrive for thousands of years after our New Testament was penned by the God inspired men who wrote it. I ask because this is a Bible Study Forum and not all may be familiar with Luther's teaching since we can't directly find it in the Bible. It would be helpful to those who are not sure of a certain teaching if references were used that we all could easily view. WOS |
||||||
6 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | DocTrinsograce | 149667 | ||
Hi, WOS... Sola scriptura is a bit of a misnomer. It's not a doctrine that teaches that there are no other authorities, nor that they don't have value. What it means is that ALL other authorities must be subordinate to the Bible. The Scripture is the final word on what we believe. Look at the story of King Josiah: Then Shaphan the scribe showed the king, saying, "Hilkiah the priest has given me a book." And Shaphan read it before the king. Now it happened, when the king heard the words of the Book of the Law, that he tore his clothes. Then the king commanded Hilkiah the priest, Ahikam the son of Shaphan, Achbor the son of Michaiah, Shaphan the scribe, and Asaiah a servant of the king, saying, "Go, inquire of the LORD for me, for the people and for all Judah, concerning the words of this book that has been found; for great is the wrath of the LORD that is aroused against us, because our fathers have not obeyed the words of this book, to do according to all that is written concerning us." (2 Kings 22:10-13) In the same way, the Reformers read God's law and saw that "our fathers have not obeyed the words of this book." In 1517 a declaration was made that the faithful would no longer forsake the Word in favor of tradition. Instead, they would return to the Biblical precepts, not leaning unto their own understanding or that of their Church leaders, but upon the Scriptures alone as their ultimate authority. The Reformation doctrine of sola scriptura points to a basic concern of the faithful church of that day, which was expressed in the cry Soli Deo Gloria ("to God alone be the Glory.") This expresses the true Christian perspective that God should receive all the glory, and that this is done by man keeping His Word as supreme authority. Paul expresses sola scriptura well: All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work. (2 Timothy 3:16-17) Jesus read and quoted Scripture; emphasizing their importance: Now when the tempter came to Him, he said, "If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread." But He answered and said, "It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.'" (Matthew 4:3-4) The Bible is God's Holy Word. That is what Christ says that man lives by; i.e., the Word of God, not the words of men. Continuing with the narrative of the temptation of Jesus, note that the Devil quotes out of context. Jesus quotes additional Scripture in order to clarify: Then the devil took Him up into the holy city, set Him on the pinnacle of the temple, and said to Him, "If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down. For it is written: 'He shall give His angels charge over you,' and, 'In their hands they shall bear you up, Lest you dash your foot against a stone.'" Jesus said to him, "It is written again, 'You shall not tempt the LORD your God.'" (Matthew 4:5-7) (continued) |
||||||
7 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | Wild Olive Shoot | 149669 | ||
Doc, thanks a bunch. That's what I'm talking about. If one is going to point to a particular doctrine or teaching that is not easily referenced within The Bible, due to name or word translation, then for the benefit of all, it needs to be explained so all have a chance to understand for themselves. One thing, if you would explain just a bit further: You stated that "In 1517 a declaration was made that the faithful would no longer forsake the Word in favor of tradition". But tradition is still part of the faithful's life, just not held above Scripture, correct? 2 Thessalonians 2:15(NASB)So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught, whether by word of mouth or by letter from us. WOS |
||||||
8 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | DocTrinsograce | 149672 | ||
Hi, WOS... There are many theological terms that describe Scriptural ideas that aren't necessarily in Scripture per se. As a sort of "short hand" people develop terminology in an effort to more effectively communicate. You're right, tradition isn't in and of itself bad. Tradition can be a valuable thing. However, everything in our lives must be examined in the light of Scripture. Like I say in my current profile, "'Reformata sed Semper Reformanda.' Which means 'Reformed and always reforming.' The Protestant principle that the Church should always be striving to conform to Scripture. So should all Christians!" This is the constant and concerted effort of the believer. We need to examine every tradition, every assumption, every idea in the light of Scripture, as we root out the lie and replace it with the truth, by the power of the Holy Spirit. I've always thought that there is a learning process that every Christian embarks upon. They must learn the Christian mind-set, the language, the attitude, the means, the practices, and the teachings. At first, it can be confusing. But we must encourage young believers to question, think, study, meditate, etc. Ours is not a faith that shyes away from things intellectual. ...Excuse me while I continue down this rabbit trail. :-) I used to love philosophy. But the philosopher is a man without solid footing. (Like the joke about a man with his feet planted firmly in mid-air!) The incredible beauty of Christian theology is that we have an anchor: the Word of God. In addition, we have the a better teacher than even Christ could be in His earthly ministry: the Holy Spirit aiding us in understanding. Sorry... but you got me on a roll there... :-) In Him, Doc |
||||||
9 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | Wild Olive Shoot | 149700 | ||
"The Protestant principle that the Church should always be striving to conform to Scripture. So should all Christians!" Doc, I whole-heartedly agree with this. We must continue to search Scripture for in God's revelation to us we find the truth. We must realize that truth and live it out in order for us to live and serve in a manner worthy of God. However, many individuals don't see the reformation as such, rather it is viewed as a separation. Martin Luther was seeking to separate from the Church he was seeking reform. But how could the “true church”, that is one headed by Christ, built on the foundation of the Prophets and the Apostles, go astray? So did Luther in demanding reform admit that Christ failed in leading His Church or that the true Church wasn’t in existence? Evidently, his protest for reform, to keep the Church, not to separate from it or abolish it, shows his respect for the Church as being true. My fear is in the establishing of doctrine instituted by men who were not directly commissioned by Christ Himself for teaching doctrine with the authority of an Apostle. The Millerites and their misinterpretation of the Second Coming is an example of what, man without the authority of Christ can do to Scripture. That is, to install teachings and doctrine that contradict the Word, which Sola Scripture denounces as it dictates God’s word, The Bible, is the final authority, not mans. How can man simply look at Scripture and decide they can know the mind of God? God in His infinite wisdom does not reveal all to us, just what He deemed necessary. With all of that said, I profess that I do look to Scripture as the final authority. But I dare not add anything to it as doctrine. All doctrine must in fact, be supported by Scripture but to take the text and use it out of context to support a doctrine instated by man is a very dangerous and unscriptural act of placing man’s knowledge above God’s. With that said, I thank you so very much for your comments and instruction. They have proven to be very effective and productive for me. WOS |
||||||
10 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | DocTrinsograce | 149765 | ||
Dear WOS, Regarding your Reformation comments: If churches had trouble straying during the time of the Apostles -- and we certainly have ample Scriptural evidence of that! -- is it any wonder that churches would have this problem after the Apostles were gone? You are correct about division. As one of my professors recently said, "Sound doctrine always divides. It breaks our heart, but sound doctrine always divides." In fact, we are told to EXPECT division. (The Greek word translated heresy actually means division!) See the following Scriptures: "But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who bought them, and bring on themselves swift destruction. And many will follow their destructive ways, because of whom the way of truth will be blasphemed." (2 Peter 2:1-2) "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables." (2 Timothy 4:3-4) "For I know this, that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock. "Also from among yourselves men will rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after themselves." (Acts 20:29-30) "Then many false prophets will rise up and deceive many." (Matthew 24:11) These passages reminded me of several other quotes: "To be right with God has often meant to be in trouble with men...." --A. W. Tozer "I am not permitted to let my love be so merciful as to tolerate and endure false doctrine. When faith and doctrine are concerned and endangered, neither love nor patience are in order ... when these are concerned, neither toleration nor mercy are in order, but only anger, dispute, and destruction -- to be sure, only with the Word of God as our weapon." --Martin Luther "A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's Truth was attacked and yet would remain silent." --John Calvin "Divisions and separations are most objectionable in religion. They weaken the cause of true Christianity ... But before we blame people for them, we must be careful that we lay the blame where it is deserved. False doctrine and heresy are even worse than schism. If people separate themselves from teaching that is positively false and unscriptural, they ought to be praised rather than reproved. In such cases separation is a virtue and not a sin." --J.C. Ryle You wrote, "So did Luther in demanding reform admit that Christ failed in leading His Church or that the true Church wasn't in existence?" To state such a things would be apostasy. God's work accomplishes exactly what He intends! It is perfect, sufficient, efficacious, and completely as He planned it. The problem here is with the eroneous assumption that the Church of God is an institution. It is not. Please note that the Church (capital C) is a work of God (see Ephesians 1 through 3). It is the body of Christ (1 Cor 12:27). Although invisible to our eyes, you are a member of it and I am a member of it, as are many others who participate in and out of the forum. Christ purchased us with His blood, and upon regeneration we become part of His body. We must not confuse this with that which is visible and of this world. Most of us are members of churches. These are the institutions. There are many of them. They have buildings, members (some saved and some not; i.e., wheat and tares), organization, structure, schedules, etc. I'll write again about your other comments. Thank you for being so patient with me! Terribly long winded, aren't I? In Him, Doc |
||||||
11 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | Wild Olive Shoot | 149768 | ||
Longed winded maybe:), but I look forward to hearing from you. However, I have stated in an earlier post that maybe it was time for me to be quiet on the subject, so if I do by chance want to respond... I'll speak softly. WOS Doc, if you would enlighten us a little more concerning Luther. How can one be sure what Luther penned was in fact correct? I guess this is for me to better understand. As I've said, Doctrine instated by man, without apostolic appointment from Christ is a touchy subject with me as I’m sure it is with many others. In fact this forum may not be the proper place to discuss since we seem to be getting back to denomination divides. But in any case, thanks for you responses. "Sound doctrine always divides. It breaks our heart, but sound doctrine always divides." At least until we obtain the full measure of Christ. Ephesians 4(NIV) 13until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ. 14Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming. 15Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into him who is the Head, that is, Christ. |
||||||
12 | wjhat are the qualifications being | John 3:16 | DocTrinsograce | 149771 | ||
Dear WOS, I wish I could figure out how to speak softly on the forum. I can't even use a small font to suggest it! :-) You asked, "How can one be sure what Luther penned was in fact correct?" Drs. Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart wrote something in "How to Read the Bible for All its Worth" that I believe is apropos. "The aim of good interpretation is not uniqueness; one is not trying to discover what no one else has ever seen before." Although Fee and Stuart were talking about sound exegesis of Scripture, the general sense of what they are saying is very, very applicable to all Christian efforts to uncover the truth. Martin Luther didn't really say anything new -- and if he did, that, at least, was probably wrong! What Luther did was to rediscover the truth. In a paper I once wrote, "He discovered it, researched it, wrote about it, taught it, and lived it. He found it running throughout the pages of the Old and New Testaments, being declared by prophets, Apostles, and the Messiah Himself. Furthermore, he discovered that these precepts were taught by the godly and learned (though uninspired) early church fathers like Augustine and Thomas Aquinas." Luther said, "I have grounded my preaching upon the literal Word; he that pleases may follow me; he that will not may stay." The Scripture is the means by which you can judge the teaching of Luther. Regarding Ephesians 4:13-15... we aren't all there yet! May the Lord hasten the day! Okay, I'll quiet down now. :-) In Him, Doc |
||||||