Subject: Dake's Annotated Bible |
Bible Note: Somewhere between heretical and unorthodox. The NT most emphatically does not teach that Jesus did not exercise any of these attributes. Nor can one conclude that if he did not exercise them, it was because he did not have them. It's the old argument from silence fallacy. In particular, how does Ken Copeland presume to know what Jesus did or did not know (omniscience)? Or, for that matter, what Jesus was or was not capable of doing (omnipotence)? The Bible does not provide irrefutable teaching on these points. I've found that novel interpretations are usually the province of heretics and academics who are trying to get published. Neither is a reliable source. Why bother with this stuff? Peace and grace, Steve aka Indiana Jones |