Prior Book | Prior Chapter | Prior Verse | Next Verse | Next Chapter | Next Book | Viewing NASB and Amplified 2015 | |
NASB | Colossians 2:16 ¶ Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day-- |
AMPLIFIED 2015 | Colossians 2:16 ¶ Therefore let no one judge you in regard to food and drink or in regard to [the observance of] a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day. |
Subject: Isn't The 4th Cmdmnt Part Of Mosaic Law |
Bible Note: Now you're claiming that your question is not what YOU said it was? A long time ago (this morning) on Tue 06/19/01, 9:06am YOU ASKED: "Isn't The 4th Cmdmnt Part Of Mosaic Law?" Now you imply you were not asking that. Now you say: "I am asking if the fourth commandment should be done away with?" Radioman asked: "Do you also keep all the dietary laws, the new moons, festivals, 20 percent tithe (look it up in the Mosaic Law -- the tithe Israel paid anually was much closer to 20 percent than 10), the command to stone a child who is continually rebellious, the blood sacrifices and all the rest of the ceremonial law contained in the Law of Moses?" You replied: "The dietary laws are sound ... why not keep a festival or a new moon ... there were three tithes ... the blood sactifices were done away with (Heb 10)." The book of Galatians and other portions of the NT more than adequately answer the general question, Why not keep all the rest of the ceremonial law contained in the Law of Moses. The NT also answers the specific question: "Why not keep a festival or a new moon." Or are Paul and the writer of Hebrews also "in error" and "not correct"? The question, Do you also keep...all the rest of the ceremonial law contained in the Law of Moses?, is a direct question -- one that can be answered by a simple YES or NO. You have not replied yes or no, therefore you have not answered the question. By your answer you IMPLY that you are in favor of keeping "all the rest of the ceremonial law contained in the Law of Moses." To do so would be to repeat the error of Galatianism, ie, mixing Law and Grace, which DO NOT MIX. |