Subject: Can we agree? |
Bible Note: Kelkat There is absolutely nothing wrong with what you just stated. What I say is wrong is these individuals take scripture out of context, ignore rules of grammar, and manipulate scripture to suit their bent. If you refuse to believe documented proof, if you refuse to believe personal testimony, if you refuse to believe testimony of experts what more can I say or do? As to the CRI issue what difference does it make to this discussion? Unless you suggesting they manufactured the evidence, in which case I would ask why have they gone unchallenged or when challenged why did they prevail? To me the answer is obvious, they had the facts and the facts supports what they were saying. Again if you chose to ignore this fine, but by ignoring the facts you don't change anything. You have made bold statements that what they teach is correct or at least harmless. Yet when I supply personal observations of the effect of this teaching on others you more or less blow it off as they listened to the wrong thing. When I suggest you may be blessed in that you had a basic foundation and was able to decipher the truth from this teaching you say can’t be they were my teacher. Isn’t it interesting that more than one person or more than one group or even more than just a few people point to these individuals as purveyors of bad doctrine and all of these people have to be wrong because you have it right? I really don’t care if you like these guys or not. After YOU ASKED I tried to the best of my ability to show you the problems with their teaching. I have personally seen enough documentation, seen enough ruined lives, talked to enough people, read enough material and have experienced enough of their teaching to KNOW I want no part of it. If you refuse to accept this okay. But don’t stand there and tell me they are not false teachers, teaching false doctrine. |