Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Is the NWT more reliable than the NASB? | Bible general Archive 1 | Tsmith | 78111 | ||
I did not say the NASB, I said the NAB. There is a difference. As for the NWT being vastly superior at 2 Peter 3:10, this is based on the translation of euJreqhvsetai. The NASB, for example, renders it "shall be burned up", while the NWT does "will be discovered." The literal meaning of such as been said to be something close to "will be disclosed" or "will be found." To say that the NWT is not recognized by any reputable Hebrew or Greek scholar is an ill-informed and unresearched statement. It is more accurate to state that the arguements raised by even the most reputable scholars (i.e. Mantey, Metzger, etc) are terribly weak and based on a false understanding of Colwell's Rule and simple theological bias (hence, all easily answer). |
||||||
2 | Is the NWT more reliable than the NASB? | Bible general Archive 1 | Radioman2 | 78116 | ||
Yes, you did say the NASB. No, you did not say NAB in any other post except this one. The post to which I am replying, ID# 78111, is the only one you have made today that contains "NAB". - - - - - - - - - - Further searching has revealed that you NEVER used the word "NAB" in anything you have posted, except for ID# 78111. |
||||||
3 | Is the NWT more reliable than the NASB? | Bible general Archive 1 | Tsmith | 78118 | ||
You are correct, I did state New American Standard Bible. My appologies. I did mean the NAB. |
||||||