Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | To wine, or not to wine? | Bible general Archive 1 | EdB | 69428 | ||
Charis Very good now prove that wine was alcoholic. As many has said many times before the words translated wine in the bible can and is used for both alcoholic and non alcoholic wine. There is no violation of context interpreting this to read non alcoholic wine. Solomon issued many warnings on the use of alcoholic wine, do you expect anyone to accept that he is now promoting it as you would have us believe? More importantly do you really think God wants us to seek something that diminishes our reasoning, capacity to understand logic, removes self restraint, and kills brain cells? Why would anyone think diminished mental capacity is walking in holiness? If holiness is our objective why use something that has a reputation of taking so many, so far, so fast from holiness? Anyone can pick up the Bible and begin reading in Genesis and they will soon find the devastation, heartache, and ruin alcohol had brought upon various people at various times. Those aspects are not in my definition of Holiness. There is not one place in the bible except for medicinal usage where alcohol is portrayed in a positive light. Doesn’t that give us a clue? When God called men to a walk of holiness in most cases alcohol was always forbidden to them. Why do you think God did that, because He wanted them to miss out on their liberty in Him? Because God wanted they to miss out on all the advantages of alcoholic consumption? God wanted them to miss out on the JOY of life? Or maybe Proverbs 31:5 For they will drink and forget what is decreed, And pervert the rights of all the afflicted. Notice the words it doesn’t say anything about being “drunk” it says they will “drink”. Again I fail to see the reason to portray alcohol in any type of favorable light when it’s reputation is so well known both in and out of the Bible. I also fail to understand brothers in the Lord defending it’s usage when all one has to do is look around them and see all the destroyed lives alcohol had a hand in. While I have been told I’m wrong and even mocked in one case, I still quite sure defending alcohol on a public Christian forum is giving ammunition to the enemy. Some spouse or parent who has been dealing with alcohol in the life of a loved one is going to get a print out of any one of these pro alcoholic appends shoved in their face with the words see even “good Christians” say it is okay to drink, now get off my back. EdB |
||||||
2 | To wine, or not to wine? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 69504 | ||
Dear Ed, Greetings in the name of Jesus! Whoa there, pardner! I am not on your back. You are not obliged to continue the discussion. We are discussing the Bible, and I have endeavored to keep my posts in line with studying and discovering the word of God. Please note that for one claiming to judge no man, you have made it pretty clear that anyone that discusses the Biblical stance on drinking wine on this Bible study forum is 'defending alcohol' and 'causing another to stumble, possible sending them to hell' and even possibly proclaiming a 'lie straight from the pit of hell, greasing a slide of many it will take there.' These sound pretty close to curses to me. I cannot prove that the wine spoken of in Ecclesiastes 9:7 contains alcohol. I can only say that I have not yet found a commentator that propounds wine means non-alcoholic grape juice anywhere in Scripture. I know that there is the possiblity that the word for wine 'could' mean grape juice, but I have yet to find a Bible commentator that uses this interpretation. And I am talking both 'old-fashioned' and 'modern' commentators, not a new 'tolerant, enlightened philosophy.' If anything, the 'old-fashioned' fellows never even considered the prohibition of alcoholic wine. However, every one of the commentators DID say that the Bible warns of the dangers of abuse. I agree wholeheartedly with them. I seriously doubt that any reasonable person could use my posts as a lever for alcohol abuse. An unreasonable person will use anything to further his way, and there is plenty of other more appropriate ammunition available without using my words. My friend and brother, with this I will stop posting to your name. I pray I don't cause you to stumble. In Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
3 | To wine, or not to wine? | Bible general Archive 1 | EdB | 69582 | ||
Charis Since that was your last append to me and this mine to you, let us be fair. This claim of yours, "Please note that for one claiming to judge no man, you have made it pretty clear that anyone that discusses the Biblical stance on drinking wine on this Bible study forum is 'defending alcohol' and 'causing another to stumble, possible sending them to hell' and even possibly proclaiming a 'lie straight from the pit of hell, greasing a slide of many it will take there.'” “These sound pretty close to curses to me." Taken outside of context these statements give the appearance of your claims however within context each carried a less accusational thought and were more of a hypothetical nature. They certainly weren’t meant to be curses or any implication of a negative situation in the lives of the ones associated with that verbiage. In other words I was not attempting to speak anything negative into the lives of anyone saying Jesus was making alcohol. Once again everyone keeps saying they are merely doing a “bible study” and I'm out running around the bushes beating back the demons of alcohol. Isn't saying Jesus, made alcohol supporting alcohol in light of the fact we don't know if it was alcoholic wine or not. What should have been said is, “the Bible does not say this was alcoholic wine or not, the word translated wine can be applied to both non alcoholic wine and alcoholic wine.” Had that truth been said at the beginning of this thread I would have had nothing to say. You say no one will use your thread to support or excuse their drinking. No true as "Justme" so ably stated, in the context of alcohol no Bible passage is better known than the wedding a Cana. I was helping a drunk out of the gutter one day, he was so drunk he couldn't tell me his name, yet he excused his drinking by saying even Jesus made wine. This man couldn't tell you the day of the week much less where he had been for the last day or two but he was a bible authority on wine. Why do you think that happened? For the same reason Satan tempted Jesus with biblical passages. If Satan can convolute the true message of the Bible to justify man's destruction he will. And man is all to willing to accept any reach to justify himself even claiming, drinking is okay look Jesus did all the time. I'm sorry if that is unkind or harsh but let the facts be facts. We do not know if the wine Jesus made was alcoholic or not. There are more warnings against alcohol and alcoholic usage in the Bible than there are admonishments to using it. We all know how easy it is to abuse, to become addicted to it’s effects. We have all seen the devastation alcohol has left behind. It adds nothing to the quality of life in its general usage, has a tendency to impede our relationship with God, and in many cases thwart’s attempts to live a life of holiness. Why, for any reason, would someone want to proclaim the virtue of something with that kind of record? EdB |
||||||