Results 1 - 7 of 7
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | No speaking in tongues, no Holy Spirit? | Acts 2:4 | Appleseed | 10328 | ||
If a person does not speak in tongues does it mean they don't have the Holy Spirit in them? I know that speaking in tongues is a gift but is there another view? | ||||||
2 | No speaking in tongues, no Holy Spirit? | Acts 2:4 | woman of favor | 10398 | ||
Acts 2:4 And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit was giving them utterance. Here you see they were filled with the Holy Spirit, then they began to speak with other tongues. The Holy Spirit, as I have experienced, gives you power to do the things our flesh doesn't want to do. Example; loving your enemy, drinking ,smoking, speaking in tongues. 1Cor 12:10 and to another the effecting of miracles, and to another prophecy, and to another the distinguishing of spirits, to another, various kinds of tongues, and to another the interpretation of tongues. Speaking in tongues is a gift, but there are other kinds of gifts as well. I believe that everyone has the ability to do any of these gifts but God decides which gift will be the one that stands out more in our lives. |
||||||
3 | No speaking in tongues, no Holy Spirit? | Acts 2:4 | Searcher56 | 10401 | ||
woman of favor ... again -both passages are examples is the gift of known tongues. -we do not have the ability to do any of these gifts, because we may all choose to be an ear and not not an eye (1 Cor 12:16) -according to 1 Cor 14, which is superior - prophecy or tongues? Steve |
||||||
4 | No speaking in tongues, no Holy Spirit? | Acts 2:4 | glory777 | 10467 | ||
1Cor. 14 - Tongues is more important to an individual by himself. It is edifying himself and also pure prayer to the Father. Tongues with interpretation or prophesy are the best in a group situation for then everyone understands. Just what it says. Debbie |
||||||
5 | No speaking in tongues, no Holy Spirit? | Acts 2:4 | Searcher56 | 10512 | ||
Debbie, You are right. -Foreign tongue by one person (for the unbeliever who understands it). -Interpet by another(for the locals to know what is said). -Foreign tongue by one person (for the unbeliever who understands it). -Interpet by another(for the locals to know what is said). 1Co 14:14 - Praying in a tongue (a foreign one in the context) produces an unfruitful mind. Steve |
||||||
6 | No speaking in tongues, no Holy Spirit? | Acts 2:4 | glory777 | 10608 | ||
1 Cor. 14:14 (NKJ) For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my undertanding is unfruitful. Paul goes on to state 15- What is the conclusion then? I will pray with the spirit and I will also pray with the understanding. This again is in the contecxt of using prophesy and tongues in a church setting. If there was no benefit to speaking in tongues, as you seem to imply (produces and unfruitful mind) why would Paul thank God he speaks with tongues more than the readers? I think the only time that tongues was mentioned as being understood by everyone was the first time. Paul didn't state anyone had to know what was being said before hand, but to pray that someone would interpret. If you have to go around asking if anyone understands what you are saying so they can interpret it, it is not a spiritual gift, but a human gift. Maybe I am misunderstanding what you are saying. Forgive me if I am. |
||||||
7 | No speaking in tongues, no Holy Spirit? | Acts 2:4 | Searcher56 | 10672 | ||
While Paul thanks God he speaks with tongues more than the readers, so that he can talk directly with the natives. I do not think everyone spoke Greek in the places he visited. The would like everyone to (1Co 14:5a), he rather have them prophesy, because he who does is greater (v 5b), second only to the interpeter (v 5c). I am not sure where we are to "pray that someone would interpret." I have a friend who attends a church that follows the pattern I mentioned in my previous post. A visitor came and spoke in a tongue. The one who interpeted said something. Then the visitor said that was not what he said, he was quoting John 3:16. My friend, a Greek prof, got up, supporting the visitor. The interpeter does have to know what is being said, otherwise what he says could be false. It can be a spiritual or studied gift. Steve |
||||||