Results 1 - 5 of 5
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Can we agree? | Hebrews | retxar | 17461 | ||
OK. I was just going by what I saw. I know nothing about the other stuff you brought up. It just seemed to me that Kelkat was saying something different than what your post was addressing. I have never even heard of the teachings you are talking about. I don't know if you are talking about current beliefs or, as I have saw so many times, a 10 year plus statement someone has made in error, and later refuted. I think it would be wise to make sure what you are saying here is what is currently believed and taught. In Christ Jesus |
||||||
2 | Can we agree? | Hebrews | kalos | 17945 | ||
"While Benny Hinn at one point denounced the word-faith message, he later picked it up again. Representatives of CRI and other evangelical apologetics ministries say they have noticed a pattern of Hinn telling people behind the scenes that he has changed, but then going on as before." **************************************** Christianity Today on Benny Hinn "Benny Hinn is controversial for his theology, his practices, and his claims. While he at one point denounced the word-faith message, he later picked it up again. "Representatives of CRI and other evangelical apologetics ministries say they have noticed a pattern of Hinn telling people behind the scenes that he has changed, but then going on as before. (...) "Indeed, for those who have been keeping an eye on him, Hinn has proven to be difficult to pin down. Not long after telling Christianity Today that the ''faith message'' (as articulated by such teachers as Kenneth Copeland ) does not ''add up,'' Hinn said that speaking out against Copeland was tantamount to ''attacking the very presence of God.'' Also, though affirming the concept of a triune God , he continues to maintain that the Holy Spirit has a ''spirit-body.'' "In last year's interview with CT, Hinn said he would no longer use the term revelation knowledge in reference to some of his teachings because of the implication that those teachings were directly from God and thus infallible. While he has shunned the term revelation knowledge, just a few months ago on TV Hinn said that the Holy Spirit was at that moment teaching him that God originally designed women to give birth out of their sides. (...) "According to Hanegraaff , Hinn several times denied to him having made the statement about women and birth. Hanegraaff said he finally told Hinn where he could find the disputed remark on the videotaped sermon. Hinn later acknowledged making the statement, calling it ''dumb.'' Hanegraaff said that when he reminded Hinn that he had credited the Holy Spirit with the teaching, the evangelist chuckled and said he had actually picked up the teaching from the (1963) Dake's Annotated Reference Bible." Christianity Today, Oct. 5, 1992 (http://www.gospelcom.net/apologeticsindex/h01.html) |
||||||
3 | Can we agree? | Hebrews | Kelkat | 17954 | ||
It might intrest you to know that the founder of CRI never intended for it to be used as it is being used today. The children of the founder have broken off from CRI and started another research organization. Kelkat |
||||||
4 | Can we agree? | Hebrews | kalos | 17966 | ||
Evidence, please? Documentation? Can you cite a journal or newspaper article, including title of publication, date, name of article, etc.? Anyone can assert anything here. Do you have any proof? | ||||||
5 | Can we agree? | Hebrews | Kelkat | 17970 | ||
Look, I don't know what you are so upset about. You say you disagree with me, but on what? You want me to site specifics, but on what? Exactly what is it you don't agree with? | ||||||