Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Dake's Annotated Bible | Bible general Archive 1 | In the Andes | 54124 | ||
Would this statement by Ken Copeland be heretical or unorthedox or orthedox? "The NT irrefutably teaches that Christ did not exercise at least three prime attributes of deity while on the earth prior to His resurrection. These were omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence. Had he done so while a man He COULD NOT have been perfect humanity. The miracles of our Lord offer further proof of His limitations as a man... It can be said on good biblical ground that all of Christ's miracles, powers, and supernatural information were the result of the Father's action through Him, thus safeguarding our Lord's identity as a TRUE MAN." Emphasis mine. |
||||||
2 | Dake's Annotated Bible | Bible general Archive 1 | kalos | 54135 | ||
'Kenneth Copeland got his start in ministry as a direct result of memorizing Hagin's messages. It wasn't long before he had learned enough from Hagin to establish his own following. To say his teachings are heretical would be an understatement — blasphemous is more like it. Copeland brashly pronounces God to be the greatest failure of all time, boldly proclaims that "Satan conquered Jesus on the Cross" (emphasis in original), and describes Christ in hell as an "emaciated, poured out, little, wormy spirit." Yet, despite such statements, Benny Hinn ominously warned that "those who attack Kenneth Copeland are attacking the very presence of God!" (www.equip.org) |
||||||