Results 1 - 4 of 4
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | God's people's land? | 2 Chr 7:14 | leabeater | 17463 | ||
Church. Somehow that word keeps cropping up. OK, let's look at this another way. Question 1: Would you fellowship with Abraham in glory and profit from it? Is Abraham's faith fundamentally different from yours (Rom. 4)? Question 2: Is the God of the Old Testament the God of the New Testament (Mal. 3:6)? Does the immutability of God operate only in context? Context is determinative of word meaning. But I submit that you do not use the "rules" of language in everyday conversation in the way you are trying to apply it to your Bible. For example, when you talk about "praying" you do not attempt to distinguish between its meaning today and prayer 3 millennia ago. Question 3: Does Old Testament inspiration equal New Testament inspiration? The Mind that authored our Bible assures us that it is profitable (2 Tim. 3:16). Tell me, what profit does this passage offer to you? How do you read it? John |
||||||
2 | Question of Context? | 2 Chr 7:14 | Morant61 | 17527 | ||
Greetings John! I just came across your discussion with Steve a few minutes ago. May I interject at this point (funny question since I will already done so by the time you read this)? :-) I agree with you (see my response to Steve and Lionstrong higher up on this thread) that the Old Testament is inspired and relevant. However, I would question your second point in your post to Steve. You wrote: "Context is determinative of word meaning. But I submit that you do not use the "rules" of language in everyday conversation in the way you are trying to apply it to your Bible. For example, when you talk about "praying" you do not attempt to distinguish between its meaning today and prayer 3 millennia ago." Let me give you an example. Suppose I overheard you telling Steve that you would give him a million dollars! (By the way, if you have that kind of money, I could use some!) Would it be appropriate for me to believe that your statement also applied to me? As I pointed out to Steve and Lionstrong, I think they both have valid points which can be carried too far. Steve is correct that context is vital. This promise was addressed to Solomon about Israel in a specific time and circumstance. Thus, we cannot take it as a direct promise for anyone else under any circumstances. The danger though is to take this position to the extreme that the Old Testament means nothing to us today. However, I think you and Lionstrong are correct in that there is a principle here. Nations that seek God will be blessed. But, the danger here is that we take every promise in the Old Testament as being directly applicable to us today. There is a distinction between the Old and New Testaments. The Old Testament points forward to the cross. The New Testament points back to the cross. The Law has been fulfilled and we are no longer bound by it. But, there is a host of witnesses in the Old Testament who have much to say to us. Your Brother in Christ, Tim Moran |
||||||
3 | Question of Context? | 2 Chr 7:14 | Searcher56 | 17542 | ||
Tim, you are partialy right. It isn't based on this verse. Genesis 12:2-3 I think fits better. We as indiduals need to seek God first. Steve | ||||||
4 | Question of Context? | 2 Chr 7:14 | Morant61 | 17571 | ||
Greetings Steve! Good point! :-) Your Brother in Christ, Tim Moran |
||||||