Subject: Sola Scriptura supported by bible? |
Bible Note: Hello I can't give you any indication as what belongs and what doesn't. Most of what has been put in the canon was agreed upon by the thought processes of Holy Men. I think there were plenty of complete bibles before canonization (Wycleff 1380, Tyndale in 1530's), Correct me if I'm wrong somebody. But I do know one thing in John 20:30 it says "Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book (book of John only?); but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ.." Now do we have the complete story of Jesus Christ? Of course not, we only need that which gives us faith to believe. There are other Historical book like Macabees I and II that the Jews refer to but we don't recoginize them as necessary books for the prophecy of Jesus. But then again the Book of Esther doesn't even mention the word God in it. So does that make it an acception to the rule over the other apocryphal books? Just my two cents. |