Subject: Sola Scriptura supported by bible? |
Bible Note: It is interesting that I have asked for evidence from the Bible supporting Sola Scriptura, and you give me this: "Check out _The Shape of Sola Scriptura_ by Keith Mathison for an in-depth analysis of the historical arguments for ONE tradition. " Am I to understand that you consider Keith Mathison to be infallible? Why should I need his argument if the Bible is sufficient? Why is the evangelical church making millions of dollars sellng books telling us how the Bible is all we need? Why are there so many Protestant denominations if they have the clear understanding of the truth? Shouldn't there only be one? And just where do you think the Bible came from anyway? Was it found on a mountain top somewhere? Or was it the church that decided which books were in and which books were out? Or did God speak to someone and tell them, but if so, where is that written so that we can see it? I am not questioning the Bible, I am challenging the worship of it. The Bible says that the church is built on the foundation of apostles and prophets. It doesn't say on the foundation of the Bible. God has always worked through people. Whether they be prophets, apostles, priests, rabbis etc... The Holy Spirit inhabits people, not books. You ask if the church were to leave the doctrine of the trinity ...? Well, if they did, then we would have to assume that they were doing the right thing, since we are they. |