Subject: Sola Scriptura supported by bible? |
Bible Note: "Non-thinking Christians, maybe. Some of the most important theological arguments made in the New Testament hinge on there being a single, historical pair of human parents. " So, if I said that you were as strong as Hercules, what does that mean? Does that mean that Hercules was a real literal person? Do you not understand what I mean when I say that? Does it mean you have no strength because Hercules was a myth? I think the thruth that God is communicating can be made even if the story is a parable. Now, if your aganda is not the witness of Christ but rather anti-evolution, then you need the literal explanation. If I was trying to prove that Greek mythology was actually true, then I would need Hercules to be a real person. It kind of depends on what your aganda is, doesn't it? ""Sanctify them in the truth; Your word is truth." --John 17:17 " It is interesting you quote John, because John says that the "word" was made flesh and dwelt among us. Have you seen any flesh Bibles lately? John also records for us: John 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Are you saying then that the comforter is actually the Bible? That the Holy Ghost is actually the Bible? I still haven't seen any scripture that speaks of the Bible. Remember when the psalms were written, the only scripture was the Torah. Just 5 books. When Paul wrote 2Timothy, there was no New Testament. So when they refer to scripture they aren't refering to the Bible, the Bible didn't exist yet. |