Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Idiom? | Bible general Archive 4 | Jim Estes | 205569 | ||
Doc, Someone, at sometime, must have made the decision that when Jesus gave the only sign that he was the Messiah by saying “three days and three nights” that it was an idiom. I read John Gill on the subject concerning Matthew 12:40 wherein he took it as an idiom that when Jesus was placed into the tomb just before sunset, that counted as a full day and night, Saturday counted as a full day and night and whatever time Jesus may have been in the tomb on Sunday was the 3rd day and night. So what Jesus really said was “as Jonah was one day and one night and parts of two other days in the belly of the sea monster, so will the Son of Man be between 24 hours, 2 minutes and 72 hours in the heart of the earth.” This is the only sign Jesus said that he would give that he was the Messiah! 2 Peter 1:20 states, “But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation. . .” John Gill does not back up his interpretation with scripture; therefore it does not comply with the requirement of 2 Peter 1:20. My question remains, what scriptures interpret “three days and three nights” to mean anytime between 24 hours, 2 minutes and 72 hours? Thank you for your assistance. Jim |
||||||
2 | Idiom? | Bible general Archive 4 | DocTrinsograce | 205623 | ||
Hi, Jim... People don't up and decide suddenly that a phrase is idiomatic. At least, in the grammatical-historical interpretation of Scripture one doesn't. I'm not sure who you're talking about. John Gill is explaining that it was not an idiom at all. By the way, Gill's expertise has been recognized for nigh on to three centuries, son. Your notion of "private interpretation" in particular, and Biblical exegesis in general, is somewhat skewed. Who's teaching you this stuff? (Please don't say you figured it out all on your own, because that will, after all, engage the private interpretation thing you're so concerned about avoiding.) In Him, Doc |
||||||