Results 1 - 5 of 5
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | The Sacred Romance | Num 28:11 | Hank | 97446 | ||
Darcy - You ponder why so many churches use books other than the Bible as teaching tools. Perhaps the Bible has the answer. Does the term 'itching ears' ring a bell? (cf. 2 Timothy 4:1-4) --Hank | ||||||
2 | Hank: Sunday School Material? | Num 28:11 | justme | 97642 | ||
Hank: Just so I do no assume the wrong thing may I ask you a question? Thank you, I will. Are you saying we should not use Sunday School material? Being a Souther Baptist for some time, I have found the Southern Baptist are very loyal to their printed and published materials mostly from the publishing house in Nashville. Which I find no fault in. I found that except for two small areas, about democratic form of governing a church, and ordination of women in positions other than pastor, I would support the New Baptist Faith and Message. Thewe to differences are no reason to disfellowship over as far as I am concernedd. Any thoughts? Blessings. justme |
||||||
3 | Hank: Sunday School Material? | Num 28:11 | Hank | 97649 | ||
Justme - It has never been my stand that nothing should be used in addition to the biblical text in Bible study classes. I'm hard pressed to think of anything more moronic than to cast out the vast body of scholarly work by spiritually discerned men and women that has been amassed since the dawning of God's revealed word to man. My point was, and is, that the Bible text should be the sole and final authoritative text, and that no secular work should replace it. But there is, it seems to me, a significant difference between the meanings of "replacement of Scripture" and "exposition on Scripture." ...... Quite possibly the questions of SBC polity relating to church government and its position on the role of women in the church are not germane to this thread, and thus I withhold comment. --Hank | ||||||
4 | Hank: Sunday School Material? | Num 28:11 | justme | 97707 | ||
Hank: In no way did I mean to bring into question anyones belief or position of women in the church. SBC has long stood for family and dignity of women and their ability to serve in the church, mission field, and countless other ways. I consider my basic roots as Baptist and have no apology to offer for it. I consider Grand Canyon University the dinest College I ever weent to and had the experience of learning form somw very spirit filled men and women. I shall be eternaly glad my roots grew deeper as a SBC student, and pastor, and now a I love my Holy Father and His Son even more. Should I ever find the perfect church or denomonation I will never jopin as I would surely mess it up. Thank you for your reply, blessings. justme |
||||||
5 | Hank: Sunday School Material? | Num 28:11 | Hank | 97709 | ||
justme - Nor did I ever think you intended to demean any part of the SBC's positional statements as set forth in "The Baptist Faith and Message." Quite to the contrary, I have found your posts in the main to be most kind and gracious. By the way, to readers who have read my many references to "The Baptist Faith and Message": If you would like to read it in full, go to SBC.net and scroll to "Statement of Faith" on the sidebar to the left of your screen. --Hank | ||||||