Results 1 - 8 of 8
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | what is the importance of tongues? | Acts 2:4 | Morant61 | 148267 | ||
Greetings Steve! Allow me to respond to your question with a question my friend. Where does the Bible say that a message in tongues must be something that is not already in the Bible? ;-) In fact, I would question the validity of any message that 'added' something new to the Bible. But, let's carry the implications of your question a little further. What does a preacher preach that it not already in the Bible? Do you see where this slippery slope could lead? Here is an example of the groundless assumptions I have been talking about. No where does Scripture say that a message in 'tongues' must be something new or unique that is not found in the Bible. Yet, this critia is used as a basis to reject tongues. :-( My limited experience with public tongues consited of messages of enouragement mostly - calls to trust God and that God would provide for His people. I have seen other gifts used in minsitry settings over the years. I was praying with a young lady in one service, when God's Spirit revealed some information to me that I had no way of knowing about her. When I asked her about, it was true and we were able to deal with the issues facing her honestly and openly. This is just one example of what spiritual gifts can do in terms of ministry. |
||||||
2 | what is the importance of tongues? | Acts 2:4 | 1-2steve | 148282 | ||
Dear Morant61, The answer to your question is found in 1 Peter 4:11. The NIV states: If anyone speaks, he should do it as one speaking the "very words of God". And if a pastor preaches something that is not biblical, I would call into question his authenticity as a pastor. Jesus, Peter, Paul and Jude all speak of the perverbial wolf in sheeps clothing. And they are out there today. So we need to be careful what we believe.:) That's my view though. Also Heb. 4:12 states that the word of God is "living" and "active"...not tongues. So I do have Scripture that backs me up. I also believe that God could have revealed that same revelation to you without tongues. Because the fact of the matter is that you were sensitive to someone else's needs.:) :). I praise the Lord for people like that!!! In Christ, Steve |
||||||
3 | what is the importance of tongues? | Acts 2:4 | Morant61 | 148287 | ||
Greeting Steve! I would certainly agree with what you have said here, but I am curious about what you left unsaid. Where does Scripture say that a message in tongues must be something that is not found in the Bible? Lastly my friend, what does Heb. 4:12 have to do with tongues? :-) Your Brother in Christ, Tim Moran |
||||||
4 | what is the importance of tongues? | Acts 2:4 | 1-2steve | 148309 | ||
Tim, Hey! What I was saying is that it's the word of God to be preached. Back 2000 yrs. ago, there was no N.T. so tongues were necessary as well as prophesy and knowledge. But the canon of Scripture is complete (including prophesy), so the need to speak in tongues today is unprofitable (I'm sure you'll disagree) because anything anyone says as far as teaching, instruction in righteousness, correction and reproof (2 Tim.3:16) is already found in the bible. So what need is there for tongues? Or prophesy, or knowledge? We have the inspired word of God to lean on and not some revelation from someone who could've easily been used by the devil to lead us astray. I'm open but very cautious. And my statement about Heb. 4:12 is simply the fact that if there are any words that someone needs to speak (as far as living the Christian life is concerned), then it should line up with God's word and not someone who spoke in tongues, and if tongues were so important, then it should have read that tongues are sharper than any two-edged sword. That was my point. But Scripture doesn't say that a message in tongues must be something that is "not" found in the bible. On the contrary, The word spoken in a tongue must line up. If not, it would not edify. But again the N.T. was not around back then, so the tongues back then would would have to line up with the teachings of Christ during His earthly ministry. I hope this helps? I'm not sure that I answered your question correctly. If so, could you restate the question? Thanks!!! In Christ, Steve |
||||||
5 | what is the importance of tongues? | Acts 2:4 | Searcher56 | 148312 | ||
Steve, greetings and welcome to the forum, Another Steve - good :-0 You said, "Back 2000 yrs. ago, there was no N.T. so tongues were necessary as well as prophesy and knowledge. But the canon of Scripture is complete (including prophesy)" I have posted something on prophesy and knowledge and tongues. There are differences when and why they will end. Enter 115095 under Quick Search. Is tongues for today? I don't know. But, I do know some misunderstand the purpose and practice of tongues. Read my post 116386 ... also 48618. Searcher aka Steve |
||||||
6 | what is the importance of tongues? | Acts 2:4 | 1-2steve | 148314 | ||
Searcher56, I went and checked out your post #116386 and 115095 and it seemed pretty sound!:) Though I still am not sure about knowledge or prophesy. But at this point, prophesy is in the N.T., and knowledge is there as well. So I have to believe that there is also no need for these sign gifts today. In Christ, steve |
||||||
7 | what is the importance of tongues? | Acts 2:4 | Searcher56 | 148368 | ||
Steve, only if the perfect has come, is knowledge and prophesy no longer needed. Tongues is a another issue. S |
||||||
8 | what is the importance of tongues? | Acts 2:4 | DocTrinsograce | 148376 | ||
Dear Steve, Just for proper balance, here are some good arguments for cessationism: Dr. Thomas Edgar of Captial Bible Seminary: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atlantis/5068/charismata/edgar.htm Dr. John F. Walvoord of Dallas Theological Seminary: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atlantis/5068/charismata/walvoord.htm Dr. Willem Berends of Reformed Theological College: http://www.pastornet.net.au/rtc/cessatn.htm And regarding the scriptural nature of tongues, I'd always recommend Charles Hodge: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atlantis/5068/charismata/hodge.htm Anyone serious about making some kind of normative behavior associated with signs and wonders should be familiar with all of the arguments and be able to address them. An alternative is to throw out sola scriptura entirely in favor of experientialism, thereby avoiding the arguments altogether. In Him, Doc |
||||||