Results 1 - 6 of 6
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | So the law was valid until his death? | Mark 7:19 | Searcher56 | 176245 | ||
Are you talking about the Tanakh or ORAL Torah. The later wan not God's Word and He qualified it bt saying "You have heard it said" vice "It is written" ... | ||||||
2 | So the law was valid until his death? | Mark 7:19 | Face | 176250 | ||
I agree. There was only one thing Yashua said about it has been said that was written in the Torah, and that was the eye for eye, tooth for tooth thing. I suspect that was being taken out of context and abused. Because the context in which the eye for eye was given was a false witness was to bear the penalty eye for eye and tooth for tooth if he was found guilty of bringing false charges against a man. |
||||||
3 | So the law was valid until his death? | Mark 7:19 | srbaegon | 176257 | ||
Hello Face, I would recommend going back and rereading the "eye for eye, tooth for tooth thing." They all deal with the just recompense if one harmed another (Exo 21:24; Lev 24:20; Deu 19:21). Steve |
||||||
4 | So the law was valid until his death? | Mark 7:19 | Face | 176275 | ||
You are correct on two counts. Exo 21 deals with men fighting and causing enough injury to make a woman deliver prematurely. It appears to do with personal responsibility for one's actions. Lev 24 deals with causing harm to another. It doesn't really reveal the context of the situation whether the harm was on purpose or not. Deut 19 was the particular one I referenced that had to do with bearing false witness |
||||||
5 | So the law was valid until his death? | Mark 7:19 | srbaegon | 176291 | ||
Hello Face, I'm correct on three counts. Deut 19 reinforces the other two passages by warning against false witness and then restates the personal responsibility penalty. Steve |
||||||
6 | So the law was valid until his death? | Mark 7:19 | Face | 176309 | ||
The difference in that case is that the false witness intended to bring harm by bringing a false accusation. No bodily harm intentional or otherwise had yet been done in Deut 19. But had the false witnesses mangaged to convice the court, then the sentence would have harmed the falsely accused. The other passages we discussed harm had already been done. |
||||||