Results 81 - 100 of 575
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: jlpangilinan Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
81 | Who do I pray to, Jesus or God? | NT general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 36359 | ||
Your Question "Who do I pray to Jesus or God? Do you believe that Jesus is God or not? If you believed: take a look at this verse: Joh 10:30 I and my Father are one. When you pray to the Father are praying to Jesus or not? you can pray to both of them, if you want to pray to Jesus what is wrong with that. But if you follow the teaching of Jesus Christ how to pray, take a look at this: Lu 11:2 And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth. Lu 11:3 Give us day by day our daily bread. Lu 11:4 And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil. I hope it is very cler for whom to pray. It is very clear how to pray my friend, just read the bible and you can get guidelines for it. God bless, |
||||||
82 | Heaven or Hell, where is Judas? | NT general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 50947 | ||
What I mean of God can justify the destiny of Judas is of where judas right now! I did not mean that God "justified judas to go to hell" but He knows where judas now. And it is God can judge what judas done, not you, not me but God. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
83 | was paul married? | NT general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 52877 | ||
I dont know why you participated here in the forum and the same time entertained the gossip such as Paul was a gay! Never in the bible that mentioned that Paul was a gay. You and the article accsuing the man of God of being a gay! It is a very disappointing! Paul is a Man of God, I dont think that Christ will choose an gay apostle! I am shock that you bought that kind of circumstancial case without any evidence. For your information, Paul never married, but never a gay! I will put some personal information about Him according to the bible: Paul was born about the same time as our Lord. His circumcision-name was Saul, and probably the name Paul was also given to him in infancy "for use in the Gentile world," as "Saul" would be his Hebrew home-name. He was a native of Tarsus, the capital of Cilicia, a Roman province in the south-east of Asia Minor. That city stood on the banks of the river Cydnus, which was navigable thus far; hence it became a centre of extensive commercial traffic with many countries along the shores of the Mediterranean, as well as with the countries of central Asia Minor. It thus became a city distinguished for the wealth of its inhabitants. Tarsus was also the seat of a famous university, higher in reputation even than the universities of Athens and Alexandria, the only others that then existed. Here Saul was born, and here he spent his youth, doubtless enjoying the best education his native city could afford. His father was of the straitest sect of the Jews, a Pharisee, of the tribe of Benjamin, of pure and unmixed Jewish blood (Ac 23:6; Php 3:5). We learn nothing regarding his mother; but there is reason to conclude that she was a pious woman, and that, like-minded with her husband, she exercised all a mother influence in moulding the character of her son, so that he could afterwards speak of himself as being, from his youth up, "touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless" (Php 3:6). We read of his sister and his sister's son (Ac 23:16), and of other relatives (Ro 16:7,11-12). Though a Jew, his father was a Roman citizen. How he obtained this privilege we are not informed. "It might be bought, or won by distinguished service to the state, or acquired in several other ways; at all events, his son was freeborn. It was a valuable privilege, and one that was to prove of great use to Paul, although not in the way in which his father might have been expected to desire him to make use of it." Perhaps the most natural career for the youth to follow was that of a merchant. "But it was decided that...he should go to college and become a rabbi, that is, a minister, a teacher, and a lawyer all in one." According to Jewish custom, however, he learned a trade before entering on the more direct preparation for the sacred profession. The trade he acquired was the making of tents from goats' hair cloth, a trade which was one of the commonest in Tarsus. His preliminary education having been completed, Saul was sent, when about thirteen years of age probably, to the great Jewish school of sacred learning at Jerusalem as a student of the law. Here he became a pupil of the celebrated rabbi Gamaliel, and here he spent many years in an elaborate study of the Scriptures and of the many questions concerning them with which the rabbis exercised themselves. During these years of diligent study he lived "in all good conscience," unstained by the vices of that great city. |
||||||
84 | was paul married? | NT general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 52880 | ||
Please be always reminded that this is a Bible forum! There is no way for Gossip here. Please take a look of What paul has done in his life and then use your logic, if a gay can do even part of it? After the period of his student-life expired, he probably left Jerusalem for Tarsus, where he may have been engaged in connection with some synagogue for some years. But we find him back again at Jerusalem very soon after the death of our Lord. Here he now learned the particulars regarding the crucifixion, and the rise of the new sect of the "Nazarenes." For some two years after Pentecost, Christianity was quietly spreading its influence in Jerusalem. At length Stephen, one of the seven deacons, gave forth more public and aggressive testimony that Jesus was the Messiah, and this led to much excitement among the Jews and much disputation in their synagogues. Persecution arose against Stephen and the followers of Christ generally, in which Saul of Tarsus took a prominent part. He was at this time probably a member of the great Sanhedrin, and became the active leader in the furious persecution by which the rulers then sought to exterminate Christianity. But the object of this persecution also failed. "They that were scattered abroad went everywhere preaching the word." The anger of the persecutor was thereby kindled into a fiercer flame. Hearing that fugitives had taken refuge in Damascus, he obtained from the chief priest letters authorizing him to proceed thither on his persecuting career. This was a long journey of about 130 miles, which would occupy perhaps six days, during which, with his few attendants, he steadily went onward, "breathing out threatenings and slaughter." But the crisis of his life was at hand. He had reached the last stage of his journey, and was within sight of Damascus. As he and his companions rode on, suddenly at mid-day a brilliant light shone round them, and Saul was laid prostrate in terror on the ground, a voice sounding in his ears, "Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?" The risen Saviour was there, clothed in the vesture of his glorified humanity. In answer to the anxious inquiry of the stricken persecutor, "Who art thou, Lord?" he said, "I am Jesus whom thou persecutest" (Ac 9:5; 22:8; 26:15). This was the moment of his conversion, the most solemn in all his life. Blinded by the dazzling light (Ac 9:8), his companions led him into the city, where, absorbed in deep thought for three days, he neither ate nor drank (Ac 9:11). Ananias, a disciple living in Damascus, was informed by a vision of the change that had happened to Saul, and was sent to him to open his eyes and admit him by baptism into the Christian church (Ac 9:11-16). The whole purpose of his life was now permanently changed. Immediately after his conversion he retired into the solitudes of Arabia (Ga 1:17), perhaps of "Sinai in Arabia," for the purpose, probably, of devout study and meditation on the marvellous revelation that had been made to him. "A veil of thick darkness hangs over this visit to Arabia. Of the scenes among which he moved, of the thoughts and occupations which engaged him while there, of all the circumstances of a crisis which must have shaped the whole tenor of his after-life, absolutely nothing is known. 'Immediately,' says St. Paul, 'I went away into Arabia.' The historian passes over the incident (comp. Ac 9:23; 1Ki 11:38-39). It is a mysterious pause, a moment of suspense, in the apostle's history, a breathless calm, which ushers in the tumultuous storm of his active missionary life." Coming back, after three years, to Damascus, he began to preach the gospel "boldly in the name of Jesus" (Ac 9:27), but was soon obliged to flee (Ac 9:25; 2Co 11:33) from the Jews and betake himself to Jerusalem. Here he tarried for three weeks, but was again forced to flee (Ac 9:28-29) from persecution. He now returned to his native Tarsus (Ga 1:21), where, for probably about three years, we lose sight of him. The time had not yet come for his entering on his great life-work of preaching the gospel to the Gentiles. At length the city of Antioch, the capital of Syria, became the scene of great Christian activity. There the gospel gained a firm footing, and the cause of Christ prospered. Barnabas (q.v.), who had been sent from Jerusalem to superintend the work at Antioch, found it too much for him, and remembering Saul, he set out to Tarsus to seek for him. He readily responded to the call thus addressed to him, and came down to Antioch, which for "a whole year" became the scene of his labours, which were crowned with great success. The disciples now, for the first time, were called "Christians" (Ac 11:26). |
||||||
85 | was paul married? | NT general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 52881 | ||
Hank, thank you for the reaction! I disappointed with the answers of Mandy 33319. Aside from that its a personal attack to my favorite apostle. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
86 | was paul married? | NT general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 53259 | ||
It seems that you doubt the personality of Man of God such as Paul? It seems that you are questioning the bible compare to the article that you read. If you going to attack the personality of paul it is the same that you are attacking the Authenticity of the bible. Bible says that paul is a man of God, you doubted it by giving false answer to the other member of this forum that he is a gay according to the article that you read. You said who knows? Me, I know that paul is not a gay, never in the bible that mentioned that he is a gay, I believed in the authenticity of the bible more than any books or any article in the world. If you continuing doubting the man of God (at the same time the word of God) I think this forum is not for you, this is a bible forum my friend, you have to respect it and not attacking its authenticity. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
87 | was paul married? | NT general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 53268 | ||
Hank, I,m fine my friend, Thank you very much. It is dangerous to have a member that have doubt to the word of God it could gave wrong influence to the other new member. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
88 | Jesus know all things why marvelled? | NT general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 62977 | ||
Ok, lets accepted that for a while that it could be translation error. but how about this verse: Mt 24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. do you think it is very different from the assessment of Peter that Christ know all things. You maybe telling me that in matt 24:36 Jesus telling this to His desciples as a human and as lower than angels of course that He is not omnicent. But at the time that peter said that Christ know all things Crist still in His human form. God bless, |
||||||
89 | Jesus know all things why marvelled? | NT general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 62983 | ||
No problem with that hank, My question is about the verses let me quoted here again those verses: Joh 21:17 He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep In this very passages, the assessment of peter Christ know all things (this time Christ is still in His human form) Mt 24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. In that passages (Christ in His human form) answers that no one know the hours but His father only. What do you think of the assessment of peter? did he made mistake? I hope it is clear now. I am not asking about being the omniscent of Christ in human form my question is about the differences between the assessment of peter against the writing of matthew. God bless |
||||||
90 | Why God tolerated Abraham and Isaac? | Genesis | jlpangilinan | 29430 | ||
I am confuse why they call abraham a father of faith? and a faithful one. Ga 3:9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. Your second statement I would not agree with this" Your statement:"The Bible shows that no one is, save Christ" Bible stated that there are some perfect: Ge 6:9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
91 | Why God tolerated Abraham and Isaac? | Genesis | jlpangilinan | 29433 | ||
I agree to those passages that you gave I know that Abraham even called the man of faith, but why a man of God such as abraham had that kind of personality a coward and a partly liar? and why God tolerated that action? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
92 | Why God tolerated Abraham and Isaac? | Genesis | jlpangilinan | 29466 | ||
I agree with you that Noah has sinned but I think he is considered save because he is walked with God. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
93 | Why God tolerated Abraham and Isaac? | Genesis | jlpangilinan | 29468 | ||
Very good detaild answer. Thanks, Johnny |
||||||
94 | Flood kills whales and sharks | Genesis | jlpangilinan | 62969 | ||
Searcher, but they are still under heaven! Gen 6:17 "Behold, I, even I am bringing the flood of water upon the earth, to destroy all flesh in which is the breath of life, from under heaven; everything that is on the earth shall perish. So it shows that God destroy all flesh in which is the breath of life, from under heaven. If God destroy all life under heaven, how about the whales shark and other sea life, did noah took them in the ark in order to preserved some of them. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
95 | Is Cain Exempted in Hell | Genesis | jlpangilinan | 235763 | ||
Did you understand the question my friend? if not leave it there ok. In the new testament Jesus Christ had a teaching of eternal life and eternal damnation... Mt 25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal. My question there is no where in the conversation of adam or eve or cain that God directly tell them what happen to thier soul after death... Ge 3:19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return. Again I am not interested on speculation or answers without backing up scriptures... Thanks... |
||||||
96 | Are they the same spirit? | Gen 1:1 | jlpangilinan | 23853 | ||
I have also cousins that raised catholic, and until now they still in that religion. It is very hard for them to change thier believed. What I did is sharing to them the word of God and pray for them and hope God will justify them becuase they are good in personality they not cause harm to anyone. The problem is reading bible is not important to them but the tradition. They are not also face discussion or a simple debate because they dont know how to depend thier faith in a biblical type of discussion they simply rely in what they heard or what they taught to them. You mentioned that they are claiming that Mary is still virgin if they read the bible they will know that it is not true. I dont believed that any woman after giving birth is still virgin. Mr 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him. It is very clear that mary has other childrens. So how come that He is still a virgin. But I respect her as a mother of Christ when the Lord is in His human form. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
97 | Are they the same spirit? | Gen 1:1 | jlpangilinan | 24035 | ||
Agree, We just pray for them. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
98 | What are God's Names? | Gen 1:1 | jlpangilinan | 61823 | ||
In the hebrew scriptures you cannot find Jehovah or Yahweh there. The hebrews scriptures stated that the name of God that Moses know is YHWH but in our time no one heard how that name pronounce. word JEHOVAH only came out in the 14th Century I dont belived that God has no name before the 14th Century. Hebrew alphabeth has no letter "J" how come that the name of God is JEHOVAH which is included the letter "J" which is not included in the hebrew alphabeth. Y"A"HW"E"H ("A" "E")also an additional in the YHWH that written in the hebrew scriptures, the put "A" "E" to pronounce it YAHWEH. If you notice that Christ never mentioned the name of God the Father either it is JEHOVAH or not (of course in the bible of JWitnesses you can find it.) If the name of God the Father is Jehovah why Crist not told it to His desciples but instead He called His "Father" and our Father. In the book of Isa 63:16 Doubtless thou art our father, though Abraham be ignorant of us, and Israel acknowledge us not: thou, O LORD, art our father, our redeemer; thy name is from everlasting. It mentioned there "Father" thy name is from everlasting. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
99 | What are God's Names? | Gen 1:1 | jlpangilinan | 61907 | ||
I am talking of the hebrew scriptures, there is no letter "J" its impossible that JEHOVAH is the true name of the God the Father. the only letter that you found there is YHWH no one now alive to testify how they pronounce it in the time of moses. JEHOVAH only came out 14th century even the jews people which is belong to the Israel doesnt know about it how come that this is the name of the Lord God. If you want to believed me please show me the scriptures that Jesus Christ mentioned that the name of His Father is JEHOVAH or YAHWEH. The name of God the father that written is this. Isa 63:16 Doubtless thou art our father, though Abraham be ignorant of us, and Israel acknowledge us not: thou, O LORD, art our father, our redeemer; thy name is from everlasting. "FATHER" everlasting father. We dont have to create any name for Him as Christ mentioned everytime in the new testament "Our Father" "My Father" Mt 6:9 ΒΆ After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Did Christ mentioned here, hallowed be thy name "JEHOVAH" or "YAHWEH"? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
100 | Please teach me about the Trinity. | Gen 1:1 | jlpangilinan | 77798 | ||
Ray, You post a very long statement but not simply answer my question. Joh 13:16 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord; neither he that is sent greater than he that sent him. If we use past tense in that verses, or we should say the time now, who really the one sent the Father or Jesus Christ? We cannot change that anymore my friend it was Jesus was sent of the Father, even He came back in His God form, still it is Jesus was sent by the Father, and as Christ said: "neither he that is sent greater than he that sent him." even Christ now is in heaven still He is the one who sent by the Father no one can change that Fact. I want you to focus on this verse: Mr 13:32 But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father. Here, Jesus said, only the Father knew the time and day of His second coming. If they really equal why christ did not know His own second coming? If you said that Christ i man at the time when He stated that, how about the Holy Spirit, did the Holy Spirit sometimes forget the time of Christ second coming if they are really equal, the Holy Spirit should know the second coming of Christ, but as Christ said" "But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father" Only the Father, Again, you cannot change that Christ is the Son, whether He come back to His God form He still the Son, and Christ said "knoweth no man, niether the son" Please answer: Why the Holy Spirit did not know the second coming of Christ if they really equal? God bless, |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [29] >> |