Results 41 - 60 of 575
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: jlpangilinan Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
41 | Is it right to use the word "Trinity"? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 38231 | ||
Yes I do believed that Father and Son are both God. What I am trying to say is that, it is Jesus telling us that they are not equal. John 10:30 "I and the Father are one". of course they are one, because Jesus Christ is a very part of the Father:Joh 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. They are one in taking of thier flocks. They are one but not equal as Christ mentioned; "the Father is greater than Him" God bless, Johnny |
||||||
42 | Is it right to use the word "Trinity"? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 38376 | ||
I do believed in Jesus Christ when He said: Joh 13:16 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord; neither he that is sent greater than he that sent him. Without any conclusion, Jesus Christ mentioned that that "is sent greater than he that sent him" Here, Jesus Christ truly accepted that who sent is greater than Him, even in the no beggining Jesus Christ knew that the Father will sent Him to save the world, so even before the time that Jesus sent here in the wolrd he knews that the Father is going to sent Him and he accepted it because the Father is greater than Him. Jesus Christ not just talking about His humanity here but more importantly reveal to us and we know that even Him accepted that who sent Him (which is the Father) is greater than Him. In addition Jesus Christ mentioned that no one knows when His second coming, but only the Father, Jesus Christ is God before he accepted to be one of us. Did He forget that time of second coming when he became a man? If they are really the same person and equal it is possible that the person that is the same as you and equal as you, knew things that you dont know? what equality is that anyway? Jesus Christ is accepted that the Father is Greater than Jesus, I believed in His word God bless, Johnny |
||||||
43 | Is it right to use the word "Trinity"? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 38378 | ||
I do believed in Jesus Christ when He said: Joh 13:16 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord; neither he that is sent greater than he that sent him. Without any conclusion, Jesus Christ mentioned that that "is sent greater than he that sent him" Here, Jesus Christ truly accepted that who sent is greater than Him, even in the no beggining Jesus Christ knew that the Father will sent Him to save the world, so even before the time that Jesus sent here in the wolrd he knews that the Father is going to sent Him and he accepted it because the Father is greater than Him. Jesus Christ not just talking about His humanity here but more importantly reveal to us and we know that even Him accepted that who sent Him (which is the Father) is greater than Him. In addition Jesus Christ mentioned that no one knows when His second coming, but only the Father, Jesus Christ is God before he accepted to be one of us. Did He forget that time of second coming when he became a man? If they are really the same person and equal it is possible that the person that is the same as you and equal as you, knew things that you dont know? what equality is that anyway? Jesus Christ is accepted that the Father is Greater than Jesus, I believed in His word God bless, Johnny |
||||||
44 | Is it right to use the word "Trinity"? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 38385 | ||
Are they equal with His human parents of course not. Do you think when Jesus Mention that His Father is greater than Him, is He speaks about His humanity? it seems that the weight of teaching of Christ here is about His humanity and not to believed in what He is saying. It seems that the important is His human form and not what He really teaching at the time. He is not revealing His human form there but to teach us: Joh 14:28 ¶ Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I. what is the weight of His teaching here? His human form no! "If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I." If we put your conclusion here, this verse will look like this: "If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I." "but before I came to this human form we are equal" Jesus Christ said: Mt 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. John said: Joh 3:35 The Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into his hand. Who is the powerful anyway? the one who gave the power or the receive the power? Jesus Christ mentioned, No one knows His second coming, only the Father. Jesus Christ before His human form is God, why He said he dont know the time of second coming? is He lie? If they are realluy equal, is that possible that the equal person knew things that the other equal person did not know? what eqaulity is that anyway? Did Jesus forget that time of second coming when He in His human form? can you show that scriptures that will said that God forget some things when He became a human?. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
45 | after death, right then, what? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 46826 | ||
Can you please give a very specific answers. When man dies what happen to thier souls are going to heaven or somewehere else? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
46 | after death, right then, what? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 46847 | ||
What do you mean is after death we are going to heaven even before the second judgement which is the second coming of Jesus Christ? How about this verse how could you explain it if you are believing that man after dies will go to heaven. Joh 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
47 | after death, right then, what? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 46935 | ||
You quoted these verses: See this concept is carried over by the words of Christ and Paul when it is mentioned again... John 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven. John 20:17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God. Ephesians 4:8 Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men. Before the ascension of Christ no man had access to go to heaven when they died. They were held in Abrahams Bosom or Paradise, if they were righteous, then when Christ ascended and made the way..then men went up in his train. Now we also go there. Where in that verses mentioned that after the death of Christ in the cross died people can go to heaven directly? You are using to much conclusion there or you speculate things that is not written. Christ mention My God and your God that is true but it is not mean it change the statement of John 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
48 | after death, right then, what? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 46937 | ||
I agree with you that there are religions that taught that the hell is just a grave and not an everlasting fire. But can you explain these verse: Ge 3:19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return. Here God mentioned to adam that when he die he will go back to dust, there is no anything mentioned here about heaven nor hell. If we use some logic, granting that adam will go to hell, do you think it is not unjust to bring the soul of anyone to the punishment that he had no idea? God did not mentioned to adam that if he will not obey God he will go to hell or go to heaven if he obey. The original plan really to adam and eve is to stay in eden forever and ever. Did God change that plan? Even moises in his teaching he never mentioned to the isralites that thier soul has destination heaven or hell. Do you think it is not unjust to them if someone go to hell, they have no idea about those punishment! Kindly explain my points, God bless, Johnny |
||||||
49 | after death, right then, what? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 47396 | ||
In genesis when God talk to adam He did not specify to adam which part of adam will go back to dust, what we have is conclusions. You did not answers my questions clearly about the punishment that adam did not know, and even moses did not taught to Israel that they soul has destiny heaven, or hell. lets consider them that they go to hell do you think it is not unjust to bring soul of anyone to the punishment that he dont have any idea? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
50 | "need" for baptiam | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 50664 | ||
The thief really in the cross was not baptized. I would like to answer the subject "need baptism" did your pastor baptized you anyway? Baptism cannot save us, but if you really want to accept Christ in your heart as your personal savior, do you think it is hard to follow baptism which is included in the teaching of Chirst?: Mt 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: It is a matter if obeying your master which is Christ. The thief in the cross is different matter as we have today. How many time Christ crusified and saves in the cross? He crossified once in Golgota, at the time there is not time for baptism in water they are both crusified there to death. If they have time, or if the time knew Christ before that day of thier crossifiction I am sure that thief will obey baptism in water in order to obey his Lord. If you cannot obey baptism in the water which is very simple to do, what else you cannot do to obey Christ? And if dont obey this simple task as a christian, I dont believed that you are saved. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
51 | If a wife is treated cruel can she divor | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 52277 | ||
Where in the teaching of Christ that divorce is ok except it be for fornication? Mt 19:9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
52 | Women in pants? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 60195 | ||
Where is your scriptural basis that wearing anything for a Christian is OK? Can you show it. we all know that God basis is in our hearth and mind, and he will never destructed if we naked or what but how about the people around you? Do you hink it is appropriate for a christian wearing anything that will distruct people in the community? Even in the old testament it is already taught to wear of appropriate garments. De 22:5 ¶ The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
53 | Women in pants? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 60197 | ||
Hank Very nice reminder! God bless, Johnny |
||||||
54 | Women in pants? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 60210 | ||
Did you read the post of the one I commenting to? He/She mentioned that wearing doesnt matter for a Christian. Do you suggest the same thing? Hank has a very good comment to tchwab kindly read them. What I am really want to say is that as a Christian we should follow an appropriate "dress code" so to speak. If we notice the fashion of today that there are people wearing approparite for a woman but I think is not appropriate for a Christian. There are women wearing almost nothing and go to a public place, I dont think if a follower of Christ then do the same thing. I know God look into our hearts, but how about the people around you? do you think they will not affected when saw you in a very seductive dress and go to a sunday worship? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
55 | limited protestant? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 63918 | ||
I have no problem with the date, my question is why creating this idea which is not biblically encourage. I am trying say why the desciples before did not celebrate it and the Christian today had? and please could you back up your answers with scriptures, I will appreciated answers that that backing up with the scriptures. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
56 | limited protestant? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 63919 | ||
Thanks for the answer. Why the apostle before did not celebrate it and the christians today had. You said it is not mandated do you think it is not important too? If it is important Im sure the desciples before will not forget to celebrate it and recorded it in the scriptures. You gave the example of singing, we we sing only the song from psalms, of course we sing a new songs, and it is biblical: 1Co 14:15 ¶ What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also. Heb 2:12 Saying, I will declare thy name unto my brethren, in the midst of the church will I sing praise unto thee. Isa 42:10 Sing unto the LORD a new song, and his praise from the end of the earth, ye that go down to the sea, and all that is therein; the isles, and the inhabitants thereof it is not wreitten that we can only song the songs of david. But this celebration is different, as I said if they are not recorded are this not important why the desciples dont do the same thing as we celebrated today? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
57 | Should I resign from the Forum? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 65838 | ||
denny, It was rabbi mark accused mommapbs of error not the enemy, please be careful, it could be a big strike to rabbi mark too. Just commented fair for both side. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
58 | Should I resign from the Forum? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 65841 | ||
denny, It was rabbi mark accused mommapbs of error not the enemy, please be careful, it could be a big strike to rabbi mark too. Just commented fair for both side. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
59 | making wine.Did Jesus make a mistake. | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 68656 | ||
You wrote"Regardless, there certainly isn't a clear Scripture either way about drinking or not drinking. My point in responding to these kinds of threads is simply to ensure that one position isn't arbritarily relegated to the 'stupid' argument category. ;-) I simply want to remind people that words are containers with which we pack a lot of meaning that may or may not have been intended originally." I believed that you can drink, but not to be drunk. My doctor advise me to take some red wine, because it is good for the heart and helps maintain blood colesterol. Even paul advise timothy to take some wine. 1Ti 5:23 Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake and thine often infirmities. so it is clear that drinking wine is not prohibited, but drunkeness did. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
60 | making wine.Did Jesus make a mistake. | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 68664 | ||
Hi Hank, Send me red wine and I will drink that. My doctor advise me to take some redwine, it is good for the heart and also help level of blood colesterol. I believed that I can drink wine (and it is not a sin) if my motive really is to improve health it is the same of taking medicine as doctor prescribe. But other reason I dont think I will drink wine. In the first place most of the wine I dont like the taste. I dont know if I read the thread correctly, if really it is a sin to drink a wine, my argument is it is ok if it will help your health improve. Drunkeness, of course we know it is prohibited, but Paul advised Timothy to drink wine for his stomach sake. So it is not really sin to take wine (more good if it is for health purposes) Tim was right not all the wine mentioned in the bible, is the same that we have today. Here in the Philippines, we have sometimes a alcoholic brebarage that can blind the drinkers even in small amount (thatnks God that company closed already) There are cases also that some of the drinkers cannot get off the bed and die in the morning of last night when they take that brevarage. Me myself did drink that brevarage I said when I was in high school (I am really a heavy drinker that time, before I know Jesus Christ). God bless, Johnny |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [29] >> |