Results 181 - 200 of 261
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: TheCurtMan Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
181 | Jehovah's Witnesses, please read | Rom 3:4 | TheCurtMan | 87766 | ||
PART 1 I would like to add some quotations of my own in referrance to the tactics and the belief of the Watchtower. The Jehovah's Witnesses are consistantly being told that they can not study, or understand the bible without the Watchtower. In a Watchtower article, Jan. 15, 1983, under the heading, 'Avoid Independent Thinking', the Watchtower had this to say, "How is such independent thinking manifested? A common way is by questioning the counsel that is provided by God's visible organization.". A book called, 'Qualified To Be Ministers', under Private Study 39, Studying the Watchtower, was this; "If we have love for Jehovah and for the organization of his people we shall not be suspicious, but shall, as the Bible says, 'believe all things,' all the things that The Watchtower brings out, in as much as it has been faithful in giving us a knowledge of God's purposes and guiding us in the way of peace, safety and truth from it inception to this present day." I personally found this to be a lie and a deception on behalf of the Watchtower because of these three predictions.... |
||||||
182 | Jehovah's Witnesses, please read | Rom 3:4 | TheCurtMan | 87769 | ||
PART 2 Prediction 1. Millennial Dawn, Vol. II, The Time is at Hand, yr. 1888. "In view of this strong Bible evidence concerning the Times of the Gentiles, we consider it an established truth that the final end of the kingdoms of this world, and the full establishment of the Kingdom of God, will be accomplished by the end of A.D. 1914." Prediction 2. Millions Now Living Will Never Die, 1920. "The chief thing to be restored is the human race to life; and since other Scriptures definitely fix the fact that there will be a resurrection of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and other faithful ones of old, and that these will have the first favor, we may expect 1925 to witness the return of these faithful men of Israel from the condition of death, being resurrected and fully restored to perfect humanity and made the visible, legal representatives of the new order of things on earth. Prediction 3. Awake Mag. Oct. 8th, 1966, under the heading, '6,000 Years Completed in 1975. "In what year, then, would the first 6,000 years of man's existence and also the first 6,000 years of God's rest day come to an end? The year 1975." For those who need help understanding Prediction 3, in short order it goes something like this. God created the world in 6 dys. On the 7th day He rested. Man will rule the earth for 6,000 years, thereafter; Christ will come and rule for 1,000 years. All this will take place around 1975. The Jehovah's Witnesses are in need of prayer and help. They are guilty of not doing their own studying, but they're also guilty of being brain-washed by the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society. Let's not belittle them, or degrade them because of their anti-biblical beliefs. The CurtMan |
||||||
183 | Five words: see also 1 Cor 14:2 | Rom 8:16 | TheCurtMan | 114451 | ||
Ray, I've read this post at least four different times. I have some questions before I dare to answer. 1. What is it that you're asking. What are you seeking. 2. Why the lower case 's' in Spirit and Holy Spirit?? What am I missing Ray?? TheCurtMan |
||||||
184 | Five words: see also 1 Cor 14:2 | Rom 8:16 | TheCurtMan | 114469 | ||
Thanks for straightening me out on that. I'm all for being filled with the Holy Spirit. It's to my understanding that if you do not have the Spirit of God residing in you, there will soon be a time when you're going to wish you had. As far as the lower case spirit in reference to the Holy Spirit. I guess I would be one of a group who would find it degrading and offensive. The Holy Spirit is just that, Holy. So why print His name in a lower case thereby denying Him the respect that is due Him, for any reason?? That is unless you do not believe that the Holy Spirit is God. That being the case, then I guess you could print His name anyway you want. It's kinda like Jesus with a small 'j', or Jehovah with a small 'j'. One other thing Ray. I know that sometimes the tone of these letters tend to be misleading. If I'm coming across any other way then frank and straightforward, then it is not intentional. You ask what I thought. The CurtMan |
||||||
185 | Five words: see also 1 Cor 14:2 | Rom 8:16 | TheCurtMan | 114686 | ||
Hey Ray, I agree with you. Distinguishing the Word of God is highly important. Giving the fact that you're right, how do you go by rectifying that which is already in print?? Also, is there a Hebrew word that refers to angel and spirit?? I ask because I honestly don't know. What I honestly believe is that God is the Author of His word. I believe that He had His word written the way He wanted it written, II Peter 1:20-21. According to the King James Version of this verse, the bottom half of v.21 says, “…but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.” Correct me if I’m wrong, but could this verse indicate that these men wrote as they were instructed to write?? And could this come right down to the very words that they used?? And could I Cor.2:13 be used to validate this point?? Or are these errors the result of translational differences?? And just for the record, I have looked up the verses you provided, and I can see your point, especially in Ezekiel 36:26. There has to be a reason why it is written the way that it is, and I have to believe that it’s the way God wanted it to be. Anything else raises too many questions in my mind. The CurtMan |
||||||
186 | True believer | Rom 10:9 | TheCurtMan | 95613 | ||
Gbt1997oct, I’m really rather curious to know why you feel you have to result to deceitfulness to get your point across. In your mind you don’t think that you’re degrading the very beliefs you’re trying to convince others of?? Are you a true Mormon?? Are you aware that if anyone was actually thinking about joining the LDS and caught wind of your actions on this forum that it may have an effect on their decision?? A true believer would actually care about something like that, do you?? To a degree your deceitfulness can be used for good. Try this one on for size. You stated that the Joseph Smith was a prophet of God, but of all of the prophets that are mentioned in the bible, none of them resulted to deceitfulness to get their point across. In this particular case, the only prophet that I am aware of that did result to deceitfulness to get his point across was Joseph Smith. For this very reason he could not be a Prophet of God. A False Prophet, yes, but a True Prophet no. And your actions on this forum have proven to be just as underhanded and deceiving as his. Jesus said something to the affect of, “A good tree can not bear bad fruit, and a bad tree can not bear good fruit” Matt. 7:15-20 What exactly is your interpretation of that verse?? The CurtMan |
||||||
187 | True believer | Rom 10:9 | TheCurtMan | 95614 | ||
Sorry Hank, I think that I just sent you a message ment for someone else. Perfections isn't one of my strong points. My apologies. The CurtMan |
||||||
188 | True believer | Rom 10:9 | TheCurtMan | 95615 | ||
Gbt1997oct, I’m really rather curious to know why you feel you have to result to deceitfulness to get your point across. In your mind you don’t think that you’re degrading the very beliefs you’re trying to convince others of?? Are you a true Mormon?? Are you aware that if anyone was actually thinking about joining the LDS and caught wind of your actions on this forum that it may have an effect on their decision?? A true believer would actually care about something like that, do you?? To a degree your deceitfulness can be used for good. Try this one on for size. You stated that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God, but of all of the prophets that are mentioned in the bible, none of them resulted to deceitfulness to get their point across. In this particular case, the only prophet that I am aware of that did result to deceitfulness to get his point across was Joseph Smith. For this very reason he could not be a Prophet of God. A False Prophet, yes, but a True Prophet no. And your actions on this forum have proven to be just as underhanded and deceiving as his. Jesus said something to the affect of, “A good tree can not bear bad fruit, and a bad tree can not bear good fruit” Matt. 7:15-20 What exactly is your interpretation of that verse?? The CurtMan |
||||||
189 | Can Satan know our thoughts? | Rom 12:2 | TheCurtMan | 94394 | ||
I have a question, something that I'm not quite clear on. Are you saying that satan knows a part of our mind because he's the one that placed the bad thoughts there? "Satan can only get at your mind. Remeber sin first starts with a thought, and that thought then the action. Satan knows that thought, he is the one that puts it there" Or are you saying that he knows our mind completely? "Satan does know your thoughts" I think that maybe you are refering to the first question, and indicating that he knows a part of our mind. Do you think that you could be a little more clearer?? |
||||||
190 | Explain spiritual gifts ? ? | 1 Corinthians | TheCurtMan | 99491 | ||
Spiritual Gifts: I Corinthians 12:8, Wisdom: Knowledge: Faith: Healing: Miracles: Prophecy: Discernment: Tongues; and the Interpretation of Tongues Romans 12:6, Prophecy: Ministry: Teaching: and Exhortation I believe we are talking about a total of 12 Spiritual Gifts altogether. According to I Corinthians 12:4-11 The Holy Spirit distributes these gifts to the Children of God as He wills. I believe that every believer has a Spiritual Gift. Do you know what yours is?? These gifts are for the edifying of the body as a whole and not for the edifying of the individual. It is for the glorifying of God and not for the glorification of the individual. In the Corinthian Church, the usage of these gifts was causing problems. They were not being used properly and for the right reason. In chp. 14 for example the Gift of Tongues were not being done decently and in order. But notice what Paul believes the Greatest Gift is. I Corinthians 13:1-13. The CurtMan |
||||||
191 | Denominations is shameful? | 1 Cor 3:4 | TheCurtMan | 92327 | ||
I mean no harm and disrespect, but would having the correct interpretation of this verse really be the solution that you're looking for?? Fact is, you did find a different church, and your spouse isn't too happy about that. And to answer your question, I'd have to say, 'NO' the original meaning of this verse isn't referring to denominational christianity. I truely pray that you will find what you're looking for. The CurtMan |
||||||
192 | Denominations is shameful? | 1 Cor 3:4 | TheCurtMan | 92416 | ||
I’m no expert on the matter, but I believe what separate different denominations is their belief system. For example, you have one denomination that believes that the King isn’t just the King, but He’s the King of Kings. Another denomination believes that with a little good works, we ourselves can become Kings, and yet another denomination believes that the King isn’t who He say He is, He’s nothing more than a Prince. The reason that I said that I didn’t believe that this verse could be used to support different denominations is because Peter; Paul and Apollos were of the same belief; they were building on the same foundation. The only difference was what the church itself applied. If your spouse wants to quote a verse, then depending on the church you’re interested in, your spouse may need to find another verse, because your beliefs may differ. If your church doesn’t believe in going through Mary to get to Jesus, then your spouse needs another verse. I strongly suggest that you take the advice of Graceful and not let the adversary use this opportunity to further separate you and your spouse. I would also suggest a study on I Cor. 7. Not just a reading of it, but a study. Continue to be obedient to you marital commitments. Pray, and let God handle the situation. He will if you allow Him the time. I personally believe that He’s already working on it. Patience, time; and this too shall pass. The CurtMan |
||||||
193 | Denominations is shameful? | 1 Cor 3:4 | TheCurtMan | 92534 | ||
What a dilemma to be in. I could probably quote half a dozen scriptures that would indicate that going through Marry really isn't necessary. Indeed, to some it is just down right unbiblical. By any chance have you had the opportunity to take me at my suggestion and look at I Cor.7?? Verse 14 says, "For the unbelieving husband is sanctified through his wife..." and verse 16 says, "For how do you know, O wife, whether you will save your husband?" Now rather your husband is saved or not, is not the issue I wish to discuss. The point that I wish to make is this: Your presence as a believer in your household has a sanctifying influence. Your husband is in a position where he has a believing wife who loves him and will be praying for him. Your obedience TO God will stand as a testimony FOR God in your household. That obedience includes your marriage commitments to your husband. My wife's obedience to God in her submissive role to me has altered my course of action on a many occasions. It has even caused me to change my view of things. Mind if I make some suggestions?? 1. Check with that church that you're interested in and see if they have a women's ministry. Something like the Titus II Woman, or WMU,-Women Missionary Union. If they do, get your name on their prayer list. Get them women to start praying for you. Also check and see if they have a Marriage Builders Program of sorts. If so, get your name and your husband's name on their prayer list. 2. Start praying, among other things, for a prayer partner. Someone you can pray with; someone you can confide in. Preferably a christian woman who either is, or has been married. There may be times when you'll need a shoulder to lean on. It would be nice if that shoulder knew the Word of God. 3. Last but not least, I would suggest that you get yourself a good Study Bible. My personal favorite is the John MacArthur Study Bible, The New King James Version. That's good for the Interpretation of Scripture, but for the Application of Scripture I favor the New American Standard Life Application Study Bible. The CurtMan |
||||||
194 | Denominations is shameful? | 1 Cor 3:4 | TheCurtMan | 92720 | ||
Contact me at: TheCurtMan000@AOL.Com I have some info. you might be interested in. The CurtMan |
||||||
195 | What do you like about the ... church? | 1 Cor 3:22 | TheCurtMan | 95762 | ||
What do you think is good and praiseworthy in say, the Roman Catholic Church? I work in a Catholic Hospital, and what I notice about the church is their dedication to Christ. Their strive to follow the teachings of loving and honoring one another. The Nuns go to the patient’s rooms and share Christ with them or share the patient’s burdens. They do what they can for the patients. They feed the hungry; clothe the clothless; and shelter the homeless. There’s morning and evening prayer everyday. And of all the surrounding hospitals within this city. I’ve noticed that the Catholic Hospitals are the only ones who haven’t laid employees off. James 1:21 says, “Be ye doers of the word and not hearers only….” Our Lord and Savior had much to say about how we are to treat one another. Matt 7:12 says, “In everything, therefore, treat people the same way you want them to treat you….” NASB. The CurtMan |
||||||
196 | Thank the Catholics for "The Passion"? | 1 Cor 3:22 | TheCurtMan | 114594 | ||
Well needless to say, I am not a Catholic, nor have I seen the movie as of yet. Some prayer buddies and I plan on seeing the movie this weekend. Personally, I believe the movie is a tool that can be used by God. From all that I’ve heard of the movie, it is causing people to sit down and give serious consideration to biblical issues. Those who are unsaved are going to see this movie. Even if one or two become belivers because of this movie, don’t you think that it might be worthwhile no matter who put the movie out. Also, a number of Christians themselves really didn’t have a clue to all that Jesus went through the night before his crucifixion. I’m actually surprised at the number of Christians who actually believed that He was hung on a smooth piece of wood. His back would have been sore, bloodlied, and raw from the flogging He took. The Cross was not smooth, but rugged. In trying to push/pull Himself up to maintain His breathing would have been painful in itself, not to mention the splinters that probably went into His back for His efforts. From what I’ve heard of the movie, it gives some insight on the suffering He went through. Then the movie itself is causing some churches to get together and discuss it through Discussion Groups. There is a verse in the bible that I do not have the time to look up for accuratcy, but it says something to the effect that if it is good and honorable, meditate on it. Meditating on the suffering of Christ will help a number of Christians to continue to Walk in the Spirit. For by giving in to the flesh, are we as Christians not crucifying Christ all over again?? The CurtMan |
||||||
197 | where to look next time? | 1 Cor 6:18 | TheCurtMan | 99573 | ||
Greetings Tim, I do not read Greek. But I've spent alot of time in the above mentioned Inerlinear. It is put out by the JW's, which is why I was studying it. The CurtMan |
||||||
198 | where to look next time? | 1 Cor 6:18 | TheCurtMan | 99591 | ||
And that is one of the reasons why I was studying it. A careful investigation of a number of their resources will show that on occasions, somewhere, somebody messes up and the truth actually gets out. It's kinda like looking for one needle in several haystacks. |
||||||
199 | Was Paul single or married? | 1 Cor 7:8 | TheCurtMan | 91528 | ||
Paul was unmarried, that is for sure. As far as him being married at one time or another, The John MacArthur Study bible tends to point in that direction in the very next verse, I Cor 7:8. Could I also suggest that the possibility exsist that you could also be misunderstanding scripture?? If you're correct in Paul wishing that all men was to remain single, then what would be the purpose of the marriage; instituted by God before the fall of man. If what you're saying is right, then it appears that Paul has a problem with the way that God is running things. Could we both be wrong?? What do you think?? The CurtMan |
||||||
200 | Was Paul single or married? | 1 Cor 7:8 | TheCurtMan | 91681 | ||
Maybe I'm a little slow in getting the point, but how do you relate this to Gen. 2:18?? Marriage was instituted by God before the fall of man. God said that "It is not good for man to be alone". When I read I Cor. 7:7, I get the impression that Paul was saying that he would that all men be like him, meaning that we should devote more time to tending to God's business without allowing the extra added concerns of marriage life to prohibit us. According to this verse, I believe that Paul was indicating that both marriage life and single life is a gift from God. Besides, even if Paul was married as a Pharisee, he maintained his status as a Pharisee without allowing his marriage life to interfere. He has always been diligent to the office he held. I'm just having a difficult time accepting that being single is better than being married. And just for the record, rather Paul was speaking by permission or commandment, you still have to deal with II Tim. 3:16. So how far off base do you think I am?? The CurtMan |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ] Next > Last [14] >> |