Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Things people THINK in the BIBLE but not | Bible general Archive 2 | BradK | 126768 | ||
Stultis, With all due respect, No, I did not ridicule you or call YOU names! I stand by what I said. What you SAID is and was blasphemous! There is a major difference between attacking a person- which I most certainly did not- and calling a spade a spade! Your statement was appropriately labeled. It is not in accord with orthodox Christianity with regard to the person of Christ. Therefore it is blasphemous. I'm not going to waste my time addressing every point, but to ignore the grammar in interpretation is either ignorant or careless- nothing personal, but a fact. It is not arguing semantics. It goes to the very heart of the matter- sound principles of Biblical interpretation. Words have meaning, and to properly interpret, we must know the exact meaning of those words. No, "My doctrine" is not mine, but that which scripture teaches and has been the foundation of the Historical Christian Church. In all fairness, as you are a newcomer, might you be so kind as to enlighten us as to what your background is and what it is you believe? Are you in agreement with the Lockman Foundation's Doctrinal Statement for starters? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
2 | Things people THINK in the BIBLE but not | Bible general Archive 2 | Stultis the Fool | 126769 | ||
I am in no way a respector of persons, and I resent that you would question my capacities as a Christian because I am new to these forums. I am sorry, but children are not born with sin. If you would care to refute all that I wrote, I will gladly change my mind. However, since your argument hinges on interpretation of the word "likeness," despite obvious context, I will remain in disagreement with you. Additionaly, I am unsure as to what "Orthodox" opinion you believe prescribes original sin, but I quoted AMPLE scripture to the contrary. If all you can do is contradict plain scripture, then neither of us will benefit from any edification whatsoever. Thank you for provoking me to such thought as went into my last post. I am now more conviced than ever that original sin is a false contrivance founded in ignorance and covenant theology. I now see how week the argument for original sin is. I say sincerely, you have my gratitude. |
||||||