Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Love for all, judge not anyone | OT general | BradK | 213202 | ||
Cheri, Could you possibly clarify your statement, "Even He could not do all of the Law for much it did not apply to Him - so He didn't fulfill All of the law."? What is your thought here? Jesus Himself said, "Permit it at this time; for in this way it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness." (Matt. 3:15) If He did not fulfill all the law, then He did not fulfill ALL righteousness! He thereby would not be sinless and able to be our Mediator! Does not Matt. 5:17 clearly state, "Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill." (NASB) Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
2 | Love for all, judge not anyone | OT general | skccab | 213203 | ||
Hi Brad, Certainly. I thought I had clarified it when I stated that there are laws that didn't apply to Him. First, maybe we're on different pages, I'm thinking of the 613 laws. You too? If that's the case, the statement remains. All means all, nothing else. Jesus could only "fulfill" what applied to Him. He was not at that time a High Priest, He was not a Levite, He was not a father, He was not a husband, He wasn't in the military, and He certainly wasn't a woman - yet there are laws for these groups of people. I certainly wasn't saying anything derogatory about my Lord!! During His lifetime, I have no doubt that as the opportunity arose He performed what was written just exactly the way God had always intended it to be done, in the spirit in which it was to be done. Sorry for the confusion. Cheri |
||||||