Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Has the church replaced Israel? | Rom 11:25 | kalos | 139243 | ||
A Kingdom For ISRAEL ____________________ "A straightforward understanding of the Old Testament leads to only one conclusion and that is that there is a kingdom for Israel." ____________________ '...it is obvious God promised a future kingdom to Israel. And when somebody comes along and says all the promises of the kingdom to Israel are fulfilled in the Church, the burden of proof is not on me, it's on them. The simplest way that I would answer someone, who is...believing that there is one covenant and the Church is the new Israel, and Israel is gone, and there is no future for Israel... 'My answer to them is simply this, "You show me that verse, in the Old Testament, which promises a kingdom to Israel, where it says that it really means the Church--show me!" Where does it say that? On what exegetical basis, what historical, grammatical, literal, interpretative basis of the Scripture can you tell me that when God says "Israel" He means the "Church"? Where does it say that? That's where the burden of proof really lies. A straightforward understanding of the Old Testament leads to only one conclusion and that is that there is a kingdom for Israel. One way to understand that is to ask yourself a question. In the Old Testament . . . and if you wanted to get sort of a general sense of what the Old Testament is about, it's simply about this--it reveals God and His Law, and it tells what's going to happen to you if you obey it, and what's going to happen to you if you don't--and then it gives you a whole lot of illustrations of that--right? It reveals God and His Law and it tells you what's going to happen to you if you obey it, and if you don't--blessings and cursing. (...) '...the literal interpretation of Scripture. Listen folks, once you're not literal, then who's to say? Right? I mean, then why not just say, "Well, Israel really means 'left-handed Texans'? If it's not exegetical--if it's not in the text, it could mean 'Canadians'" How can you say, if you can't say what's literally there? ____________________ To read more go to: www.biblebb.com/files/macqa/70-16-9.htm |
||||||
2 | Look to OT or NT for answer? | Rom 11:25 | MJH | 139274 | ||
But doesn't the New Testament fulfill the Old Testament? And therefore shouldn't we look to the NT for the answer to this question? MJH |
||||||
3 | Look to OT or NT for answer? | Rom 11:25 | EdB | 139282 | ||
We should if the New Testament answers the question. However the answer is prophesied in the Old Testament and has yet to be fulfilled in the New Testament. The prophet Ezekiel, Daniel and others spoke of the prophecy, Revelation tells of it’s yet to come fulfillment. EdB |
||||||