Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | where did this teaching come from? | Acts 2:37 | Grace and Truth | 53236 | ||
One Problem in [Thomas Nelson]'s interpretation of the word (eis, Gr.) the same word is use in Matt 26:28 "For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many "for" (eis) the remission of sins". So Mr.Nelson would have to rethink his view on his interpretation. Jesus used it in the same context! | ||||||
2 | where did this teaching come from? | Acts 2:37 | Hank | 53239 | ||
Grace and Truth: Well, just to clear the decks, Thomas Nelson is an old, well-established publishing firm and "Mr. Nelson" didn't write a word of the footnote reproduced in my former post. The Believer's Study Bible is a compositie effort by more than 50 Bible scholars, preachers and teachers. The book has been in print for well over a decade, so I'm reasonably certain that "Mr. Nelson" has had every opportunity to re-think his explanation of what 'eis' means, but thus far has appended no correction to what you consider to be his woeful blunder :-) Here again, G and T, you have demonstrated your expertise in swatting flies, in nit picking, all without the least display that you are concerned with anything more than promulgating a distinctly one-sided denominational bias. That has been the import of your posts from day one. To continue playing biblical ping pong at this level is both fatuous and inane, defies reason and common sense, feds no one and thus I, before signing off this thread, appeal to you in the name of common courtesy, to dismount from your baptismal steed and let the poor horse get some much-needed rest. --Hank | ||||||