Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Bible and evolution both? | Gen 1:1 | Reformer Joe | 19497 | ||
We do not compromise what is revealed in Scripture as truth for the sake of the fallacies of neo-Darwinism. The origin of the diversity of species via descent with modification is not scientific fact. That is the bottom line. It is a theory based on a metaphysical rejection of the supernatural and a false extrapolation of something that actually does occur in nature (natural selection). The authenticity of Scripture IS an essential, Steve. If we say that Genesis 1-2 are "spritualized" versions of the truth, where do we stop with the spiritualizing and concede that "all the rest" REALLY happened the way it was written? --Joe! |
||||||
2 | Bible and evolution both? | Gen 1:1 | kalos | 19529 | ||
"That the Bible is 'inspired but not true' is just about the silliest thing I've ever read on the Forum. Mixing in the word literal with truthful is a very cunning trick, obviously designed to deceive." Joe: I agree with you fully. May I just add the following in support of your posting? The following are re-posts from the thread "How did we find out? -- Jim D. -- 7-15-01." "H. and N.: "It seems we have yet another poster who delights in creating confusion and doubt regarding the truthfullness and inspiration of the Word of God. Where do they all come from? "Maybe we need an alternate forum. In addition to StudyBibleForum.com, perhaps someone should start up a CriticizeBibleForum.com or an Anti-BibleForum.com. I've never before seen such calculated deception in action. "That the Bible is 'inspired but not true' is just about the silliest thing I've ever read on the Forum. [Mr. D's unique mixing of the words] literal and truthful is a very cunning trick, obviously designed to deceive." ************************************ k. and H., Perhaps they all came out of the woodwork together, fashioned after the same mold.. It's a shame that the Study Bible Forum seemingly cannot exist without having someone question the inerrancy of the very Book that this Forum is based upon! I'm sorry to say it, but we must continually be on the lookout for posts written by people who cast doubts upon God's Holy Word. I guess that I am totally 'wrong' in assuming that everyone here on the Study Bible Forum would already have the idea in their conscious mind (an 'unwritten rule') that the Word of God is indeed inerrant!! Nolan |
||||||