Results 1 - 4 of 4
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Corrected post! sorry for err! | John 1:1 | roviear | 56840 | ||
Hank, point well made. Although I do not agree with you, I do see your pov. In Christ, Estelle |
||||||
2 | Corrected post! sorry for err! | John 1:1 | kalos | 56860 | ||
I would like to know: which part of Hank's posting do you not agree with? The part that gives a factual definition and origin of the words "gosh" and "darn"? Or the part where Hank says: "Christians should always be mindful of what they say and how they say it"? |
||||||
3 | Corrected post! sorry for err! | John 1:1 | roviear | 56946 | ||
Hi, Kalos. Greetings to you this new week. I do not agree with the implication that gosh is just as bad as using the Lord's name in vain. I do agree with the origin and with Christians being mindful of what they say. In Christ, Estelle | ||||||
4 | Corrected post! sorry for err! | John 1:1 | Hank | 57328 | ||
Of course, Estelle, after studying the English language for well over half a century, I have come to the belief that one does not have to accept the common usage of English or any other language. He may, if we wishes, write his very own private lexicon and do it in a way that is not far different from the self-appointed sole authority on the exegesis of Scripture. Where the bird of one feather is found, one can expect to find a kindred species in a nest near by. --Hank | ||||||