Subject: A thought about the Flood |
Bible Note: "It is said that no valid evolutionary scientist believes man evolved from a non-human life form. Yet evolution of man from an ooze of muck and mire is still in our textbooks, is still taught in our schools and colleges, still presented to the public as a viable answer to creation of man." Where do you get this???? Have you suddenly declared 99.99 percent of evolutionary scientists invalid? I know many and do not know any that disagree with the idea man evolved from a non-human life form. I do not say they are right, just that they all believe it with a very few exceptions. Your first paragraph is an interesting statement. I have no problems with it. The second and thord paragraphs are also very valid. The first sentance of the last paragraph has repetition of doubtful information. It is statements like that that I object to. Greentwiga |