Subject: A thought about the Flood |
Bible Note: Radioactive dating is highly accurate. I am a scientist and a fundamentalist Christian who has worked as a missionary. I have also worked in the radioactive dating field, and know no scientists that admit any major flaws. Scientists do argue over purity and original concentrations, but have methods to answer the problems. We might just as well argue that all stars are no farther away than 6,000 lightyears away. Even if we prove the radioactive problem, we still suffer the star problem. Some reputable Christians, instead argue that God created an earth and starry heavens about 6,000 years ago with an apparent ancient history of about 15 billion years. I just accept the facts of the Bible and the facts of science. I am willing to argue about interpretations of the Bible and interpretations of science, but I base it on solid arguments. Show me why carbon dating, tree ring dating, ice core dating, seafloor dating, and lakebed dating, along with stalactite dating are all wrong with strong scientific facts and arguments. As it is, when I attempt to witness to scientists, we have to get past them rejecting the message because they lump me with the Creation research people. Scientists find their work very unscientific. The bones are there, they are ancient by all our tests. Lets deal with them honestly. Greentwiga |