Subject: The Problem with WoF in a nutshell |
Bible Note: Vehoka: No, I was not referring to you in my post, ID# 95027. In the last 365 days, I have submitted 137 posts regarding the Word Faith movement. In all that time, there have been many, many WOF advocates who have posted to the Forum. In the past week there has been much conflict with user gracefull over the WOF issue. I definitely did not have you in mind when I submitted the Note to which you refer. I do not lie. I did not lie to you. I do not see one word of anyone's "opinion" in my Note, ID# 94881. What I see are facts re Fred Price -- documented and verifiable facts. So it is not a matter of me agreeing with someone's opinion. I merely accepted the verifiable and documented facts I quoted. Even if it were opinion, which it was not, quoting someone else's opinion and agreeing with it is not the same as writing my own opinion. As far as issuing disclaimers with my posts, I do so when necessary. I.e., when I have no scriptural or other factual basis for what I post, I label my opinion as opinion. I do not normally post anything that I cannot back up with Scripture or other factual evidence. I am not given to speculating on the Word of God. Once again, I was not referring to you when I said, "...some of the WOF advocates here on this forum thought I was criticizing...". Since I wasn't referring to you, then I made no assumptions about you. I took what you previously posted at face value and hoped that you took what I said at face value. I never even thought you were an "advocate" of the WOF. Nothing you have posted would indicate to me that you were. As far as having a kinder, gentler attitude toward the purveyors of heresy and blasphemy, see Hanks post, ID#95082. I agree with him. I have no reason to bear any ill will toward you. I'm sorry If you interpreted anything I wrote as being hostile toward you. I regret that there has been a misunderstanding regarding my motives and intentions. I welcome you to the forum. Grace and peace to you, Radioman2 |