Subject: Crusifiction of Christ |
Bible Note: Love Fountain Secular history proves crucifixion was the preferred method of execution of non Romans used by Romans. They took this form of execution and perfected it so as to inflict the most suffering possible. It also was a an excellent form of negative advertising as the all could see what fate awaited anyone breaking Roman law. Death comes by suffocation, the malefactor must push against the nails in his feet to lift himself to get a breath. The struggle comes as weakness sets in and the body going in and out of shock tries to decide which is worst the pain or the need for air for life. This along with the shame of being exposed at such a intimate time as death entertained the Roman psyche. To say Jesus did not die on a cross is as close to heresy as one could come, since the scriptures clearly states Jesus was nailed to the cross, hung there and died. The Jewish secular historian confirms this. Since both history and the bible bear witness to the fact Jesus died on the cross why would anyone consider otherwise? Please reframe from contradicting the Bible. It is one thing to discuss an issue it is entirely different to propose theories in direct contradiction to the Bible. EdB |