Results 141 - 160 of 1275
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: srbaegon Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
141 | Moses saw God's face and didn't die why | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 34649 | ||
Hi JMSCOTT, There is no conflict with God's warning against seeing His face. "Face to face" is an idiomatic phrase meaning they were together in the same place in close communion. Steve |
||||||
142 | Moses saw God's face and didn't die why | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 34657 | ||
JMSCOTT, You'll have to help me here. I've checked 4 translations (KJV, NASB, ESV, Amplified), and they have "mouth to mouth" instead of "face to face" in Num 12:8. Which translation are you using? And while you're answering, would you share your explanation of how God can tell Moses he cannot see God and live, yet allows Moses to do so? So far, you have attacked my answers but given none of your own. You are completely wrong that Moses was the only man to change someone else's name--Nebuchadnezzar and Pharaoh did so. Steve |
||||||
143 | Moses saw God's face and didn't die why | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 34669 | ||
Hi JMSCOTT Well, if I've figured this out, you are saying that Moses was able to speak to God face-to-face because of the manifestation God took. I can partially agree with that. I say partially, because you never explain what your conclusion is. Nor did you answer my question. Let's just forget it. Steve |
||||||
144 | What is his loins ? is for men only | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 36659 | ||
Hello Andrew Jr You said, "This is reason...children always have the same blood type as their father." I would be more inclined to say that the father determines the child's blood type. My reason is that I am A pos, my wife is B neg, and my daughter is AB neg. My daughter is not the same blood type. The part about male and female spirits in one body, I'll have to think about. On the surface it sounds wrong. Steve |
||||||
145 | Raven and John Reformed, Baptism? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 36882 | ||
Hello Raven Let's get to the heart of the matter--Abraham. Here is a man declared righteous by God upon believing. No baptism; no circumcision; no nothing. He is then used by Paul in Romans 4 as the prime example of the same requirement for us--faith alone. Steve |
||||||
146 | Raven and John Reformed, Baptism? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 36978 | ||
Hello Raven You've missed the whole point of what I said. Genesis 15:6 (ESV) And he believed the Lord, and he counted it to him as righteousness. Romans 4:2-3 (ESV) For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness." Please consider the enormity of what has happened here. Upon belief Abraham was righteous and just in God's sight. Yes, that faith was perfected by works, no question. But that's a separate issue. Steve |
||||||
147 | devine revelation | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 36979 | ||
Hello I disagree with your father. Only those who are truly heavenly-minded can be any earthly good. Those who act like they don't have time for this world because they're thinking about heaven so much--they are just conceited and selfish. They don't have God's interests at heart. Steve |
||||||
148 | HOW COULD JESUS BE A DESCENDANT OF DAVID | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 39419 | ||
Hello Judith I would ask you then, "Who is worthy?" I ask because Romans 3:9-18 says that none are worthy. Steve |
||||||
149 | HOW COULD JESUS BE A DESCENDANT OF DAVID | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 39601 | ||
Hello Judith, Romans 3 says no one is good. There are no good cells in any of us. Only by believing on the Lord Jesus Christ that we gain anything good. Steve |
||||||
150 | HOW COULD JESUS BE A DESCENDANT OF DAVID | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 39674 | ||
Hello Judith All of us tend to be bad. Government is put in place to inhibit the bad and promote good. It's true a bad person can do a good deed, but that does not make him a good person. When God created the world, He saw that it was very good (Gen 1:31). When sin came into the world, everything changed (Gen 3:14-19). Now, we natural do bad (Rom 3:10-23; 8:6-8) until we believe on Christ (Rom 8:9-14). Steve |
||||||
151 | Why not use Yahweh for LORD? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 39817 | ||
Hello JMSCOTT Wait a minute. At one time you said the New Testament books were inspired by God. Now you seem to be saying that they are not inspired because they use "kurios" instead of "YWHW" or "Yahweh". Which is it? Also you said: "if is not importan why did every prophet bear a portion of gods name in their name" They didn't--Amos, Nathan, Gad. Steve |
||||||
152 | Why not use Yahweh for LORD? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 39823 | ||
Hello JMSCOTT I agree that all Scripture is inspired of God. But your definition of Scripture includes Old Testament only. My definition includes both Old and New Testaments. So I repeat my question: Is the New Testament inspired? And if it is inspired, then why is God not permitted to have the writers use "kurios" and not "YHWH"? Steve |
||||||
153 | Why not use Yahweh for LORD? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 39835 | ||
Hello JMSCOTT, So you have stated that only Genesis-Malachi is inspired by God. Thank you for that clarification. God divided the Bible into two testaments by establishing a new covenant (1 Cor 11:25; Heb 8:1-13). Steve |
||||||
154 | Why not use Yahweh for LORD? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 39841 | ||
Hello JMSCOTT Yes, the new covenant is written on the heart. But I add that the New Testament is written on the paper. What I have come to understand is that you believe Genesis-Malachi is inspired by God. However, you have never told anyone what you believe about Matthew-Revelation. Steve |
||||||
155 | Why not use Yahweh for LORD? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 39853 | ||
Hello JMSCOTT, I know you believe all Scripture is inspired, but according to your own reasoning only Genesis-Malachi is called Scripture. What does "would mess up the writings with their own tranlations,foul ups, mispellings, bloops, ...blunders" have to do with Paul writing these books. Are you saying that Paul made all those mistakes, or are you saying Paul was correcting mistakes? And what makes you think the Greek New Testament is so messed up? Is it because there is a small difference (less than 10 percent) between all the manuscripts because of scribal error? The Hebrew text has variations between manuscripts as well. Does that make it any less Scripture? And why don't tell us plainly what you really believe about Matthew-Revelation? Where did it come from? What is it's purpose? At least give us that much. Steve |
||||||
156 | Why not use Yahweh for LORD? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 39937 | ||
Hello JMSCOTT If Matthew-Revelation is inspired, then it is God speaking through men. If God is speaking through men, then the word "kurios" as used in the Greek text, is an accurate and proper usage instead of "YWHW" or "Yahweh". Steve |
||||||
157 | HOW COULD JESUS BE A DESCENDANT OF DAVID | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 39941 | ||
Personal note.................. Hello meusing I just wanted to encourage you as you contend for the faith. I have been on this forum regularly for 6-7 months and am surprised at all manner of falsehood that is promoted. BTW, anyone who appreciates C.H. Mackintosh must be solid. :-) Steve |
||||||
158 | Why not use Yahweh for LORD? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 39973 | ||
Hello JMSCOTT Can I prove Paul used kurios instead of yhwh? No more than you can prove he used yhwh instead of kurios. We've never seen the original documents. We have to rely on the faithfulness of those who copied the documents. Can I prove that Paul wrote in Greek? Probably. It was the most universal language at the time. Greece was in power before Rome, and the language was in common usage to communicate between cities and nations. It was ideally suited for the spread of the gospel. The earliest Greek copies of the New Testament are from the 2nd and 3rd centuries. Translations and the Dark Ages had nothing to do with it. As for the arguments on this forum, it's evident that there are many who do not listen to the Holy Spirit's teaching. Steve |
||||||
159 | Why not use Yahweh for LORD? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 40303 | ||
Hello JMSCOTT You are changing your argument. Acts 4:18; 5:28; 9:29 all speak of the name of Jesus. We are speaking of yahweh and kurios. I know who the hellenists were. Paul consistently refuted their leanings. What's your point? You wrote: "is there "any" record of of any man or group of men who were inspired to translate the bible?" No one needs to be inspired to translate. People only need to be accurate. It sounds like you are saying that all Scripture must be written in Hebrew and Aramaic. Is your Bible in Hebrew? Steve |
||||||
160 | Do ALL demons have names? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 41842 | ||
Hello CDBJ I stand corrected. Thanks for pointing this out. Steve |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ] Next > Last [64] >> |